The Line-up is in the “Allies vs Axis” format and with vehicles being from 5.0 to 6.7 BR. For some despicable reason, the two mentioned vehicles are in this bracket. No need (it shouldn’t) to explain futher. I must assume they were left over there after some BR changes but they still are completely out of place.
Russian main here, in case someone think I am complaining after being killed by one of those…
2 Likes
The PT-76 needs to go, the Type 60’s need to go, the Fiat’s need to go, the STA’s need to go and once they’re done we can remove the Fox.
Also don’t forget the broken Puma armoured cars fighting reserve tanks and the Pz IVH which is completely broken against most of the tanks it fights, hence why you see so many of them in low tier battles.
The “late WW2” room also has an “interesting” French lineup.
I always wondered why some vehicles are in some rooms and others are not. For example, why not add the JPz 4-5 to that room too? It’s at that BR range in ground RB. If the answer is that it’s not there for historical reasons, why are other anachronisms present instead?
Like you said, why is the Puma so low? It seems like they couldn’t decide if they wanted sim lobbies to be historical or not and just ended up deciding on a case by case basis.
2 Likes
I don’t know the general criteria but I assume each line-up is based on the general performance a vehicle can have compare to the others. Now, if this is true, my complain for example with the PT-76-57, is related to the laser rangefinder or the Fox having sabot rounds able to shred medium tanks and even some heavies. Both features are totally out of place. Of course I’m aware of other vehicles being out of place in other brackets. I just opened this because yesterday i was plaing that bracket and i was so pissed off by being able to use those vehicles…
1 Like
a Fox seeing a PT76-57 is flat out BS no matter what and then you add that they are fighting mid ww2 stuff into the mix and its just insanity