So I guess AAM-4 is coming as a heavier AIM-120A equivalent unless sources or data is found, similar as to how PL-12 is modeled as a heavier and worse R-77
1 Like
Minor tree syndrome
3 Likes
These are again, exceptions. The HESA plane is a modified F-5. The Me-262 isn’t “the first ever jet-engine” lol. It’s the first “production” jet engine. There were jet engines before that. The americans even have their earlier jet in this game, but it wasn’t mass produced. And the LA-7 is again, a modified LA-5. Why didn’t you compare technological rivals like the US and the UK? They had very similar planes, just like the AIM-120 and the R-77 are very similar missiles.
Personnal attacks should remain in your brain,…
And comparing to missiles from two different countries that don’t have access to same technology, simply because “they came the same exact years” don’t makes them Technologically fair, whatsoever you can say about it.
So i did compared exactly the same way you did,…
1 Like
No you didn’t. Stop replying to me. You have no arguments, only hyperboles which nobody wants to read.
So, late as always
1 Like
So i guess people in F15C would be able to launch 8 AIM-120 in seconds and get like 5 kills that easy?
You still didn’t give me any REAL fact that states AIM-120B and R-77A are currently technologically fair to each others,…
From my PoV, the R-77A have been made to counter AIM-120A and AIM-120B have been to avoid that, and keep an edge over the R-77,… therefore nothing is Fair, and this is currently my point → nothing is fair whatever the YEAR,…
Technological balance is made through weapons abilities and not through Weapons Year of 1st service.
Therefore, you can’t imply that AIM-120B vs R-77A is Technologically Fair when using a DATE as “proof”
R-77A does not exist
sadly
1 Like
You can notch missiles and sticking to ground probably will still work even though it shouldn’t
1 Like
I hope we get the J-11B or a J-10 variant now that Su-27SM is pretty much confirmed. J-8F is just sad.
Ok,… R-77 (i used R-77A to avoid some people coming with R-77M1 or later variants, by analogy to how USA described their missiles)
still no arguments.
You wanna be listenned here? Start to give arguments
Yawn
Now matches will end faster on the still undersized maps with oversized teams. Cool, I guess?
J-11B looks pretty hopeful now since the Su-27SM was shown and PL-12s were stated as being added for sure.
Probably opposite since everyone will have to notch much more now
what about sweden? no RB99?
Unless multipathing remains as overblown as it is
RB99 is just the swedish designation for AIM-120Bs. Will come for sure on Gripen C
1 Like
Then ARH will be barely usable
Basically meta will remain the same but everyone have R-27ER