oh, you mean an aisan version of “USSR” was existed by law?
that’s what the israelis call ayit right?
Yeah weird, they should be able to copy paste. It’s really good
What?
what law do you keep talking about?
The truth is you dont care the real person from China, only trust the fake news
wheres the “democracy” now? is that the majority should obey the miniority?
Right, pulling out the “pot calling kettle black” play. We can do that all day long.
Say, what about VN’s conduct in Paracels, Laos and Cambodia?
Plus, y’all did agree in 1958 that we could take Paracels, then why not after 30 April, eh?
I do agree that ASEAN should get your own TT, but pulling that imperialism card? Man, that’s a bit cringe.
Ayit my beloved rahhhh
But the Ayit ingame its the A-4N
1 Like
i think the problem is fixed now ?
japan wont get the vt4.
and people like me are asking to end this wierd debate and asking for better solution such as taiwan stuff not being added from 6.0 and +.
but also replacing modern taiwan with pakistan.
2 Likes
You said: “USSR was a union in law but separate to indenpent nations”
My question is: is there any union in law that TH is part of japanese union?
it isnt, so why assume southeast asia is japan?
southeast asia isn’t japan
thats the issue, what ever Chinese player said now, they just said
“JP didnt got VT4, so CN got biased”
But the fact is most of the top tier of CN now is just “weaker” than the others if you ever played it
And the topic just got wrong like this
2 Likes
Never said this, countries shouldnt be under other countries bc they were part of. But ingame this logic applies.
1 Like
TBH I’d rather see F-CK-1 the Chinese TT instead of Mirage, as I have reiterated many times. From there you can then have mirage, late Jeff and F-16V. Putting the Chengdu jets under the ROC subtree was a bit too weird.
is it a formal legal union of japan then?
it isnt, so why TH go JP? just by invasion
then why TH goes JP?
also pretty much whole southeast asia
yeah, hope maybe taiwan can be a little sub tree to korea ? i really wish it is
1 Like
Nah, Taiwan stays in China, while Korea stays Korea. Two nations ravaged by Cold War politics shall at least be united ones in-game. Putting ROC under Korea not only depletes the Chinese TT, but it also has severe repercussions from the Chinese player base.
In the perspective of UNGC and both PRC’s and ROC’s constitution, Taiwan has been a constitute part of China——question is who should rule and represent its entirety.
There is no reason why ROC TT should be moved to Korea. (I’m trying to make my point clear whilst remaining calm, despite how your comment makes me raging like a bull.)
same reason germany gets the polish leopard and latvian boxer
(not every nation gets its own tiny tree, especially not right away)
same reason sweden gets norway and finland
well its only these two option that we have, all other such as korea to usa wont work