Like the F-16 does?
That had its BR lowered to 12.7 due to how just how bad it was doing at its old br, its a weird case of why its there
I was referring to the f4J and it literally saw combat in Vietnam
And your belief of what makes a vehicle good aligns with gaijin’s, you trust gaijin implicitly that their judgement is best? Because that was the only thing standing between f16 and mig-29’s performance. MiG-29 isn’t doing great at 12.7 with literal R-60s either.
1 Like
f16a is currently 12.3 my bad, and has very little fuel when on full afterburner
No, it doesn’t. Not only does the internal fuel tank last all game if you aren’t carelessly burning it but you have external fuel tanks. Not that this matters because the MiG-29 fuel tanks are both smaller AND its consumption is higher… lmao what a comparison
internal fuel buddy, 7000 gallons or maybe 5 min on afterburner include for takeoff maybe 3-4 min and external adds 12000 so max around 20 min till your out of fuel when using afterburner and most people do that to get to the fight faster
???
what are you confused about?
my guy, stop right here, you’re embarassing yourself. The F-16 both has a larger fuel tank than the MIG-29 as well as lower rates of consumption, not that ANY of this matters
Everything regarding what you’re attempting to say
your embarrassing yourself actually, considering you haven’t realized that the mig29 has radar missiles while the f16a doesn’t, and the mig has 2 engines so it has more survivability if you lose an engine.
oh wow i never thought about that difference!! wow!!!
thanks for confirming you are trolling
1 Like
oh yea f16a has 9L’s only so not to hard to flare with 1 or 2 flares if you do it right,
way better than R60MKs for sure!!111111
I no longer advocate for anything to be lowered in BR unless it’s an extreme situation. We need to start voicing loudly the need for decompression with a higher top end BR.
4 Likes