Aim-9Ls are much better then the R-60M
Having to face 4 AIM-9Ls and 4 AIM-7Ms in a jet with an excellent flight model and radar is just as bad as having to face 2 ERs.
Remove the ERs and move it down if need be but you can’t say the 27ER at 12.3 is gonna be an issue when we already have some jets that are already devastating for 11.3s to fight
It shouldn’t have ERs anyways. They should just remove it and give it the R-73s
For the love of God don’t
Maybe instead of of asking for BR decreases we can ask for other BR increases, no?
It isn’t right but I don’t think hyper compressing 12.3 works as a solution. Unless you remove R-27ER, and DONT give R-73, but the plane needs its R73s.
You have long since given up on the idea you care for this going by how you present yourself on the forum. You no longer care.
I agree but community is dumb and doesn’t.
trying to act like R-27ER wouldn’t be quite literally two guaranteed every single match kills in a 11.3-12.0 lobby is disingenuous.
sea harrier fa.2 at 14.0 let’s go!!!
(come up with better ideas, this one sucks)
Lmao get real
It’s a very thin BR. Very few planes exist at 12.7 worth mentioning and the ones that do, it’s VERY debatable if MiG29 is worse or better than M2K, as well as F-16ADF or 16AJ
No…? It would have 4-6 R-73 versus maximum of 2 and a way better FM. It would only lose in RWR.
Zero point, makes the plane useless. MiG-29 is not comparable to F-16. F-16 is strictly superior.
re-read this again:
“trying to act like R-27ER wouldn’t be quite literally two guaranteed every single match kills in a 11.3-12.0 lobby is disingenuous.”
Get real, F-16 runs laps around MiG-29 FM in game, even the block 15.
In what mode???
No…
I agree
no logic found, at all. R27ER would massacre 11.3-12.0 as it did historically.
so you want it to face aircraft from the 60’s?
Like the F-16 does?
That had its BR lowered to 12.7 due to how just how bad it was doing at its old br, its a weird case of why its there
I was referring to the f4J and it literally saw combat in Vietnam
And your belief of what makes a vehicle good aligns with gaijin’s, you trust gaijin implicitly that their judgement is best? Because that was the only thing standing between f16 and mig-29’s performance. MiG-29 isn’t doing great at 12.7 with literal R-60s either.
f16a is currently 12.3 my bad, and has very little fuel when on full afterburner
No, it doesn’t. Not only does the internal fuel tank last all game if you aren’t carelessly burning it but you have external fuel tanks. Not that this matters because the MiG-29 fuel tanks are both smaller AND its consumption is higher… lmao what a comparison
internal fuel buddy, 7000 gallons or maybe 5 min on afterburner include for takeoff maybe 3-4 min and external adds 12000 so max around 20 min till your out of fuel when using afterburner and most people do that to get to the fight faster
???
what are you confused about?
my guy, stop right here, you’re embarassing yourself. The F-16 both has a larger fuel tank than the MIG-29 as well as lower rates of consumption, not that ANY of this matters
Everything regarding what you’re attempting to say
your embarrassing yourself actually, considering you haven’t realized that the mig29 has radar missiles while the f16a doesn’t, and the mig has 2 engines so it has more survivability if you lose an engine.
oh wow i never thought about that difference!! wow!!!
thanks for confirming you are trolling
oh yea f16a has 9L’s only so not to hard to flare with 1 or 2 flares if you do it right,
way better than R60MKs for sure!!111111
I no longer advocate for anything to be lowered in BR unless it’s an extreme situation. We need to start voicing loudly the need for decompression with a higher top end BR.