The Leopard 2AV that was going to be built irrespective of whether US trialed it or not. See the Leopard PT-16/14? It’s 2AVs predecessor in terms of prototype development.
I ask for vehicles built for
Yea, and 2AV wasn’t built for the US. It was built for Germany and sent over for comparative trials in hopes the US chooses it as their next MBT. In fact, 2AV was the last stage of Leopard 2s development. It was only given a 105mm due to US requirements, but in Germany it was always outfitted with a 120mm…
sub nation like denmark, india, romania, norwegian.
There is a difference, sub tree is a whole line, this is not the case for argentinia , you might see i never called it a sub tree for a reason. You want me to show you all the times Smin clearly stated this to be the case and getting annoyed by people like u not understanding this?
They do not have the “equivalent” of three Leopard 2A7’s, they have three equivalent Leopard 2A5’s with the MEXAS armor package. I would say the Stridsfordon 9040’s are good, and don’t get me wrong, they are, but the PUMA is better is every aspect, other than maybe fire rate. PUMA gets IRST (All Strf 9040/35/30 models should too, but they don’t), PUMA has a crew less turret, PUMA has better thermals, and the sPz PUMA has better protection.
Cope harder
Sweden has the best ground… Strv122 armor outperforms everything really… +Better optics if compared to early German tanks
We dont need your sympathy you ain’t god
But we need common sense
Which really lacking here
Let alone their airforce both winged and rotary
And people vehemently refuted the US getting those vehicles. Gaijin chose to not give us those vehicles. Why should the US be forced to have gaps, while other trees can cherry pick whatever vehicles they want to fill their gaps?
