Following the roadmap: grouping vehicles (Italy air TT)

[IngegnerMacchi]

Greetings, seeing the roadmap and especially the italian air TT rework, i wanted to share two different (but similar) variants that could be adopted and would pave the way for a broader tree in the future.
The core idea behind the 2 rework is not only shortening the research time and hurdle, but also make some clarity and sense all over the tree, grouping vehicles for similarities in roles and production/performance.
Here is the “first version” that would be the one more suited for accomodation for future additions to the tree:

The second version on the other hand, tends to shrink the research time even more, but aims to spread more the vehicles in the various ranks trying not to leave holes (where possible):

Let me know what you think and eventual modifications you would do :) i think the rework that is planned is not that great especially seeing the C205serie III and N2 not being foldered and the re2005 being foldered with the G55

[kamina_sama]

this is vastly better than all the work done by gaijin, i wish gaijin would do something like this

[IngegnerMacchi]

Thanks mate, appreciate It a lot

[nathanclawfish]

I find it hillarous that members of the community have been able to group these trees into folders better then gaijin in a significantly shorter time then they have spent on it if the road map is to believed. big thumbs up from me :)

[MarioGilera83]

GJ not playing his game…

[IngegnerMacchi]

thanks a lot ^^, hopefully this would reach gaijin

[BranchyTerror90]

Honestly i find this trees well organised and having this examples as final results in the game can be a good idea in my opinion (also you forgot the G.91 Y)

[IngegnerMacchi]

Thanks 🤗, i didn’t forget the G91Y tho, i moved It into the attacker line

[Il_Signor_Regio]

Good job. I Will only like to’ see the Tornado in the bomber line with maiby in future more addition to’ that line. It Is a Better work compared to the One made by gaijin in the “TT reworks”

[BranchyTerror90]

Whoops, yes that’s on me, then i have the personal opinion to group the two planes together (the Y and YS), for me, it wouldn’t be that bad of idea even though a lot of people want the Y or the YS to be on the attacker line

[IngegnerMacchi]

That’s more than understandable, imo there should be a lot of changes, like tornado in bomber line, splitting F-104S in bomber and fighter variant, F-84F in bomber line etcetera since those were the task they had irl, but in game things are slightly different but wanted to add the G-91Y on attacker nontheless to resemble its main role

[TerraStalker]

Looks very nice! Put in tree as it should be :)

[Nicholas_Concu]

Good job.

[IngegnerMacchi]

I’ve done another possible configuration with the idea of keeping the 4 lines instead of 5, however is not as balanced and do not allow for much expansion as the other 2:

[Eretaloma]

Great changes! I hope gaijin implements these

[ImportantSimone5]

@kamina_sama

this is vastly better than all the work done by gaijin,

(Not that it takes much to engage more than Gaijin)

[ImportantSimone5]

Why Stukas near the normal bomber?

[IngegnerMacchi]

cause they are dive bombers

[ImportantSimone5]

They could also go into the ground attack aircraft tech tree, right?

[IngegnerMacchi]

in theory yes, but there are lots of planes missing even in the ww2 era that could take those spots