It’s not helpful at any BR. The best way to dodge radar missiles is to fly low, and if you’re flying high, you’re better off pointing your engine at the missile and running away.
At lower BRs, radar missiles (~10.0 to 11.0) are just a nuisance. They aren’t a real threat.
Notching does nothing without chaff. Flying low isn’t a magical shield and is easily defeated by anyone who knows what they are doing. The ability to just switch on periodic chaff deployment whenever your very very good RWR hints at a threat is an advantage that cannot be dismissed. Almost no other aircraft in the game can just preemptively dump dozens of chaff at the slightly hint of a threat. Especially large chaff
Sure, and Su-17M4 can go down in BR too. [Not my actual view.]
Tornado IDS is a superior bomber to Su-17M4, flat out. Using superior self-defense missiles and superior flight performance.
If you have issues surviving in air RB matches, choose different routes.
My KDR the last time Tornado IDS was 11.0 was over 2:1, in a bomber… bombing…
With a reduction in A2A fit of Aim-9Gs it would still be 10.7-11.0 and would still face some with strength like the Mig-23s at 10.7 but more likely it would be 11.0 (when compared to others already at 10.7) and would still face all the strong SARH slingers at 12.0.
The tornado would have to loose all AAMs or the BOZ pods to go much lower than that and what of the sub-sonic strike aircraft not that far below. Do they go lower as well?
I have never had issues with the 9L’s. I believe they have the same flare resistance as an R60 when both are fired front aspect, but with a smaller seeker FOV, so they should be a bit better overall at avoiding flares.