Ok but in their defense that applies to like literally everything in WT ever so it proves they’re unbiased
didnt they “remove” the water so that it could actually use vtol for extended periods more than 30s?
Don’t think so. I know the thrust has a bodge or something because set to IRL figures it didn’t work or something
That was disproven already.
Gaijin simply got the Mk.101 Pegasus thrust incorrect and gave it the thrust of the Mk. 102 and 402 engine.
All the other Pegasus are by brochure numbers.
(However I have installed engine thrust and they all need a decrease in thrust)
I believe personally that the weight of the gun pods is in the fuel as the gun pods are modeled as part of the basic aircraft.
Just want to point out that Gaijin hasn’t even gotten the visual models of the British Harriers correct. Legit just gave them all the AV-8A model. Didn’t even get the flaps and aileron sizes correct.
Below is RAF harriers:
Notice under the front nozzles the fuselage was widened for the more powerful engine.
Between the two nozzles the British harriers have a different nozzle aerodynamic cone than the Gr.1/AV-8A.
The front nozzle cone is also smoother and extenders further behind the front nozzles effectively covering it more.
GR1 and GR3 also have AV-8A/C cockpits I think. Which is why there are flare buttons in the cockpit on the GR1
Not quite every harrier has the Gr.3 cockpit by the looks of it. The American harriers did not have INAS the backup sight was also different.
AV-8C swapped the backup sight for the AN ALE 45f rwr display.
I believe @Gunjob confirmed there was a report made to get the AV-8C its correct rwr as well as the Thai ones.
1 Like
The US harriers used different equipment IIRC and that would explain the slight differences
1 Like
Along with different navigation and transponders and rwr
meanwhile the AV8-A: RWR??? WHAT RWR???
Yes it had none, same with gr1
1 Like
Saw Christine GR.9 today on my journey!
The cursed harrier that has a car as a kill marking
5 Likes
Pretty. Wish she was still flying.
Still waiting for the devs to reply again. Hopefully might have an E-M diagram soon (with luck).
6 Likes
Oooh I wonder what they will come up with to ignore it this time. Gonna be fascinating. But seriously, Bravo Matrix, you are doing great work. And you have the patience of a saint.
4 Likes
Thank you. I’ve taken a break from harriers for a while.
If you want to see something interesting check out my cvrt and chieftain posts.
I tried playing the AV-8S Late and this happened to me, but with a side-aspect R-60M while I was preflaring lol. Never flying a Harrier in RB again until they’re fixed.
4 Likes
Chances are they won’t be fixed lol.
2 Likes
Pleased to tell everyone that I was in fact correct. This is now the only known official E-M diagram for the Harrier 1 Available to the public.
You would test this in game with about 80% fuel.
Just want to thank everyone who has been supportive and anyone who questioned the Harrier can go kick rocks lol. in a friendly way ofc.
9 Likes