[Feedback] Nuclear Escalation: The Fight Continues!

Darn…

IS there a problem with servers, cause some people are suspecting the AGM 84 harpoon is causing the server to crash

1 Like

fly high? i tried you get touched by a mica or aim-120 or an ASTER-30, fly low? you get touched by ITOs

we need ECM pods ngl, it’ll give us more survivability

2 Likes


i got killed by a Pantsir while i was bulling the Spyders, why does NATO has Pantsirs???

bc its not segregated on the country, its a mixed CSTO NATO thing so i think the UK and another country fights w china and russia, and also fights w other NATO countries plus russia, its very weird

image
my bad these are the teams, its really weird

i was Russia, thats what boging me i saw S1 in the RWR and thought it was a bug it even showed me it was friendly

no idea then, AI be bugging tf out

ok, so i tried playing this gamemode, and…
this mode is like two times worse then it was when it came first time around

the spacing was not adjusted at all, but stronger and better SAM systems were added
if you fired like 4 missiles (ARMAT for example), 3 of them will prolly not make it before getting exploded by the sams

additionally, you decided to put clouds EVEN LOWER then it was before, making some areas insanely hard to attack, Sam launches insanely hard to spot unless you fly low to the deck, and overall experience even more annoying, nobody likes to just stare at random clouds when fighting the enemy.
some nations (like france) usually use either scalp-eg or sometimes hammer to do SEAD missions, however, how can you do SEAD with a weapon that is artificially limited do 30km of range? because tgp wont allow you to lock at longer ranges, and the sams will shoot you down before you will get in that 30 km range, unless you hug the ground, then pop up quickly, fire off your weapons and go to the ground again. In my personal opinion, this creates a really unfunny and boring gameplay loop, where everyone is forced to the deck.

additionally, BR for such things dont make sense, a 2020 mirage 2000D or tornado gr.4 cannot be played (even if m2k has 7 hammers and you can take ARMAT with it, and tornado has 7 ALARMS) but a viggen DI or j-8f can xd tornado ret 8 cant be played there aswell. BR bracket system does not make sense for such a gamemode. Or atleast with the air realistic br only

additionally, i also find markers to be too OP for such a gamemode, which requires you to sneak around, you can just get randomly spotted by a random guy flying by, the element of surprise is basically not there.

having only top tier bracket is annoying as all hell aswell, not everybody has top tier vehicles like rafale or su-30, you dont get additional support vehicles anymore, and even if they do have it, they might not want to play them, because not everyone loves top tier gameplay.

TLDR; you turned a gamemode with “mediocre gameplay, but with some polishing and changes it could be really good” to a gamemode that might soon be on par with heli pve xd

14 Likes

Cannot stress this enough please do away with mixed battles I’ve had enough of that in regular ARB mode this is the chance to try more realistic matches

Remove markers maybe?

4 Likes

Would it be possible to expand the allowed planes to modern attackers like the Su-25SM3, Mirage 2000D RMV, and various Tornadoes that were already barred from the last one due to the more limited nature of an April Fools event, and are about to get barred from this one by the BR range ?

1 Like

or they can make it NATO V CSTO not
image
whatever this is

3 Likes

only if MiG-29 is left out

Yeah I hate that

1 Like

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

1 Like

Absolute joke of a mode, Every game connection is lost

1 Like

we have a real big problem guys… Community Bug Reporting System

1 Like

the harpoons guidance doesnt even work properly yet either, its still bugged

I played three Matches so far, and always got kicked for “Internet Issues” within 2 Minutes, despite not having any Internet Issues at all

The Harpoon missile may be difficult to guide because there is an obvious typographical error in the part of its configuration file that defines its cruising altitude.

IMG_20260609_012115