AI overview is not a source
and thrust losses are modeled
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/0z5dFWAbAtSV
another example
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/WT6E3lzf3NkT
is this ai?
i expect to see you again when the F-22 turns out to be a 1990s fighter and not an X wing from star wars
1 Like
yes
1 Like
They don’t. So hop off of me trying to question my knowledge on what im talking about when time and time again ive proven u wrong… go do some research or somethingu clearly need it.
did they even look😭
the manager agrees with me
1 Like
This entire thread just proves why AI is going to get sick of humans and kill us all
2 Likes
had similar on my own report of hawk 200
1 Like
could someone please tell how does he want to change something being false with the actual fasle something info
1 Like
ts too funny at night
for me it has the effect of losing hope into humanity
dont forget that these people are allowed to vote as well
1 Like
i knew it my hunch was right
Spoiler
calm down g
pretty sure the official website of the engine makers say what they should have your AI also seemed to get sources from war thunder fourms which is a horrible source of information
tbf eft and rafale both 80’s fighters if you really look at it. so F-22 should be the best FM ingame. other 5th gen not really better in FM either
official pratt & whitney website says this while war thunder wiki says this:
this from official GE aerospace website
so I’dk what this means tbh maybe under performing F15E engines by a 3000 kgf of thrust but i do not know the altitude of which the offical sources tested the engines at
F-15 intake loss ingame is questionable but would probably end up with some slight nerf in other areas to keep it accurate to real world charts
typically taken as sea level static thrust on a bench but you never know