F/A-18D Late (Malaysia) should receive the AGM-88C instead of the AGM-88A

The Malaysian F/A-18D Late currently has access to the AGM-88A HARM.

The problem is that Malaysia is not known to have purchased or operated any version of the AGM-88 in the first place. So the current AGM-88A is already not based on an actual Malaysian weapons inventory.

Because of that, it seems the missile was added based on the capability of the F/A-18D platform itself.

If that is the standard being used, then I think the AGM-88C would make more sense than limiting the aircraft to the much older AGM-88A.

The F/A-18C and F/A-18D are part of the same Legacy Hornet family. The D is the two-seat version, and official US Navy sources normally refer to them together as the F/A-18C/D when discussing weapon integration.

NAVAIR also specifically connects the F/A-18C/D with the AGM-88C. In its article about AARGM testing, it describes the newer AGM-88E as a complement to the existing AGM-88C HARM and states that it is intended for the F/A-18C/D.

Source:

NAVAIR – AARGM completes first test on Growler

The F/A-18C/D platform is also described here:

NAVAIR – F/A-18 A-D Hornet

There is also an inconsistency inside War Thunder itself.

The Finnish F/A-18C MLU 2 receives the AGM-88C, while the Malaysian F/A-18D Late is limited to the AGM-88A.

F/A-18C MLU 2 (Finland) – War Thunder Wiki

F/A-18D Late (Malaysia) – War Thunder Wiki

I am not claiming that Malaysia historically purchased the AGM-88C. They apparently did not purchase the AGM-88A either.

That is the main point of this report.

If the aircraft is supposed to follow the real Malaysian weapons inventory, then it should probably have no AGM-88 at all.

But if the AGM-88 was added because the F/A-18D platform is capable of using HARM, then there does not seem to be a good reason to restrict it specifically to the AGM-88A when the AGM-88C is documented for the F/A-18C/D family and is already used by another Legacy Hornet in War Thunder.

Suggested change

Replace the AGM-88A on the Malaysian F/A-18D Late with the AGM-88C.

The NAVAIR website appears to be region-blocked in some countries. The source is accessible through a VPN. I can also provide a mirror/archived version if required.

Well, weapons in the game are, most of the time, especially at higher BRs/ranks, provided based on the compatability and operational capability of using it. Therefore Malaysian F-18 getting 88A is not surprising, but that doesn’t mean it can’t get 88C either, I am all for getting weapons that are real and make sense, especially if they are present IRL

Yeah, that’s basically my point as well. I don’t think the AGM-88A itself is necessarily wrong, but if weapons are being added based on platform compatibility and operational capability rather than actual Malaysian procurement, then I don’t see why the AGM-88C should be excluded either.

Especially since the F/A-18C/D is documented with the AGM-88C, and War Thunder already gives the Finnish Legacy Hornet the C variant.

Both aircraft are also at the same BR, so I don’t really see a balance reason for one Legacy Hornet getting the AGM-88C while the other is limited to the AGM-88A.

The Malaysian F/A-18Ds did get SCS-29C software upgrade in 2023, they are about as advanced as Legacy Hornets get. From a quick search it seems AGM-88C was integrated with SCS-15C (correct me if I’m wrong), so the Malaysian Hornets should be able to use it compatibility wise.

But this is probably just a decision to add AGM-88A to the 14.0 Hornets, and not that Gaijin don’t believe they can use it.

2023 is pretty recent. Are there any other weapons they gained compatibility with besides the 88C? I know the Super Hornet got Stormbreaker compatibility in 2023, so I’m curious if a similar software update was pushed out for Legacy Hornet customers too. At the very least JSOW might be on the table.