You have a lot of time, this thing won’t arrive this year
1 Like
more power to you, im just in awe about the number of games in such relatively short period of time. at least for how i usually play.
2 Likes
The F15C MSIP II will always be the king of BVR in my opinion given its real life record too of 104-0. I have nothing to complain about the C MSIP II and the E even though I don’t have it.
1 Like
Hopefully, thank you, I can’t type your name because I don’t know how to but power to you my freind.
1 Like
Thanks, my name is Voyenny_Krasny Red_military, In Russian cyrillic
2 Likes
Pleasure to meet you, Voyenny_Krasny Red_military. 🫡
2 Likes
F15e maybe?
They are saying AWACS is not in game so no plane can utilize it
1 Like
Oh my fault
Just because it flew alongside those doesn’t make it equal lol.
1 Like
You always take a part of what it said and assume what it means? Never said it’s equal but it did and that was what I stated since it flew along side them but not at the same speed or same capacity since it can’t.
You said:
See the highlighted part. It’s not that far of a stretch that if you end that sentence with “for a reason” that you mean to imply that they were at least somewhat equal.
USSR has the lowest top tier winrate according to statshark so those players are clearly the worst
lol F-18C is among the best dogfighters in the game.
You are not required to pull max Gs, and if you’re losing to Su-27SM then holy moly batman…
AIM-120C-5 is currently rather correct. ~110km range at 12,000 meters which is the biggest change from C-4 to C-5.
1 Like
every plane 13.0+ has this function in the game called TWS
It uses only 10% composite materials, has no serrated edges, is a large steel and titanium tub with trapezoidal handles.
compared to the eurocanards the hornet’s RCS is much higher… Rafale and EF use around 50% composite materials in the fuselage, the Rafale has serrated edges on the wings and air intakes, the Gripen also uses more than 30% composite materials in addition to being a very small aircraft.
the level of refinement of the Eurocanards, especially the Rafale, is much higher than the F18C, even the E (despite E having a much more advanced refinement than C) , and this is reflected in the aircraft’s RSC, Boeing in general uses very “conservative” designs.
The f18 has an RCS similar to the j16, which is a much larger aircraft than the f18. The lack of composite materials makes a huge difference.
The f18 has an RCS similar to the j16, which is a much larger aircraft than the f18. The lack of composite materials makes a huge difference.
the overwhelming majority of modern aircraft do this, This is not an exclusive feature of the F18… in fact it is a standard feature of modern aircraft, even the JF17 Block 1 does this.
The purest copy… it is so difficult to accept that there is a nation with aircraft with the same level of technology or even better in some areas than American aircraft, it is so difficult to see the negative and positive points of the aircraft and learn from the negative points and explore the positive points to the maximum.
The F18 has some problems, but it is far from being a bad aircraft, its only real problem is its top speed for a 14.0
as I said before /\
It only got worse… the fact that it’s about E, which is much better than C, shows how wrong you are about your wild claims about the f18C.
F/A-18E flight performance is mostly worse than legacy hornets…
are you sure?? the only bright green in the US table is in BR 6.0-6.3
The US likes earthy tones on its table
the print was taken at 13:21 on 11/07/2025
1 Like
USA 40% WR LOL, USSR 53% GRB, ARB USA 46% USSR 53%, I used your own source, what will your argument be?
1 Like
40% watafuck Bruh
1 Like