F/A-18 Hornet (Legacy): History, Performance & Discussion

Yeah, F404 development is interesting, to say the least. Afaik both the notched and un-notched F404s (I’ll classify as “late” and “early” respectively) had the exact same thrust output. The only difference was with the fairing/exhaust petal design. Why was it changed? No idea, found nothing on it. Small sidenote, but I had also noticed a similar design change from the F101 mounted to the 4x B-1As, vs the F101 DFE and eventual F110 seen on the F-16C and F-14B/D.

At least the LERX fences and inner tailfin brackets have a tangible reason (vortices generated by LEX impacts on tailfin, causing major fatigue/possible damage, LEX fences disrupt vortices and brackets strengthen tailfin connection to fuselage, causing way less wear and tear).

You should see the vast number of differences in the Chengdu J-20 between production batches by comparison… it is very interesting.

1 Like

SDB II -stormbreaker has been declared Initial operational capability (IOC) for the F/A-18E/F
(whoops wrong hornet thread, oh well)
https://www.navair.navy.mil/news/Navy-declares-initial-operational-capability-SDB-II-Super-Hornet/Wed-02182026-1406

1 Like

just found a image of a OG F/A-18 mounted with 28 MK83s


yes the wings are sagging a bit but they were made to be bent

7 Likes

Neat to see the centerline holding something more than a singular piece of ord, dunno why gaijin thinks that the centerline pylon cant hold at least MERs to begin with.

1 Like

its more or less the space it takes up due to it being right between the landing gear doors

1 Like

lore accurate hornet, we gotta have this in game