Just a copy of JHMCS from the F-16’s and F-15’s.
I think it would be good to make an report, but im unable to do so…
Yeah there’s the report I linked about JHMCS which should cover all aircraft that use it. Just a case of getting the report accepted.
Well, hornet JHMCS should be different a lot, idk
Whats your proof of this?
Too lazy to find anything else, but it’s here.
Posted this in RR thread, but F/A-18A has lost the Sparrows on stations 3 and 7, but has moved down to 12.3 in Air RB
Why did they lose them? What historical reason prevented this, or was it simply something added with later variants?
Either way I think this will simply make it a better and more fun aircraft, 12.3 is an extremely viable BR for the capabilities of the F/A-18 in Air RB! Think I’ll definitely focus on grinding this aircraft before the C variant now.
I’m pretty sure it’s a thing with historical accuracy
Real quick, Which Hornet’s currently have access to which Targeting pods?
I know the ATFLIR is in the Files, and I don’t think the LITENING (-AT) is carried by the -18C’s
which Nighthawk (AAS-38) variant does each airframe have?
As I’m currently reworking a report to attempt to get them included in a change, due to the pods having A2A track mode.
If i remember correctly - A has AAS-38 and C early has AAS-38A
That’s a bit frustrating.
I’ll send them though anyway, so it provides an option for buffing various airframes (or prospective additions) since the AAQ-28(V)4 is carried by a number of other top tier airframes.
New ATFLIR pod report is up, LITENING-AT to follow soon
[DEV]The ASQ-228 ATFLIR should be impacted by this change toIRST
18Cs have carried LITENING ATs since atleast 2006
If I reacall the AAS-36 is only for TV/IR weapon slaving and the AAS-38A got a laser designator for LGBs.
It is sad. In GRB Walleyes now remove your A-A weapon
You would still have one AIM-7 on the fuselage station opposite the Targeting pod (since there is no point taking the AAR-50 navigation pod) and 2x AIM-9.
Ahh I see, and later version were I’m assuming? That’s quite interesting.