ah, i changed it now. hope you like it
1 Like
So, what you’re saying is the F-1 has exactly as much justification to receive flares as the F-5C?
İts almost 2024 and people still talking about whether F-5C’s countermeasure should be removed or not.
Guys accept it, Gaijin will certainly not gonna remove countermeasure system from F-5C, its one of the best selling premium in the game.
Also technically it can mount countermeasure systems so therefore there is no need to argue.
Defeatist mindset helps nobody, but given you have a 60%+ WR with the F-5C over 300+ battles I severely doubt that’s the sort of mindset in play here
As i expected you already checked my service record in order to justify your point by simply using this Logic.
Well too bad that F-5C is compatible with countermeasure systems and you can do nothing about it.
As are a whole lot of aircraft that don’t get them around this tier, and there’s nothing you can do about that.
i mean, if it does. It would probably become 10.7. Same way the F-5C would probably drop if it got them removed.
if it can mount them its good enough justifications for standards set by this game. And idk if people would like a 10.0 F-5C more than the current one. but ignoring that, it having flares on it makes for a good plane to play for top tier newbies
1 Like
Nope.
You mean poor Japanese T2 and F1 planes that you were constantly victimizing?
Too bad Japan didnt give a shit about arming them with flares, but hey keep complaining about F-5C dude.
Honestly, the ramifications of a 10.0 flareless F-5C might just be enough to get Gaijin to actually decompress BRs.
A whole chunk of formerly babied players, suddenly having to play to the same levels as similar flareless aircraft at the BR… Now that’d be a whole lot of loud complaining.
1 Like
“Too bad Japan didn’t give a shit about arming them with flares”
Oh, you mean like the US and the F-5C? Very nice job defeating yourself in an argument, well played.
Edit: And oh, wow, what’s that image above? Why, it’s a T-2! And carrying two AN/ALE-42K ECM pods, already far more justification for it and its brother to receive them than the F-5C :>
5 Likes
Oh Well, if you couldnt understand what i meant in the first place then its your problem, but let me fix it for you.
The differences between those planes and F-5C is that F-5C is compatible with flare systems.
On the other hand there is not a single evidence that proves either T2 or F1 can be equipped with Flare systems.
Looks like bein a one nation main doesnt work for your comprehending buddy, i suggest try other nations.
Read above post by me, cry.
Also, >Implying I main a single nation
Oh you mean chaff pods? Too bad it still doesnt give you flares.
What a pathetic attempt dude…
Aaaand what evidence does the F-5C have of ever mounting countermeasures again, despite all your claims it could? C’mon, champ, surely there’s an image of just one C mounting some sort of countermeasure! I mean, given what you said, if another variant could use them, it must’ve been so easy to slap them on!
1 Like
…Also, Chaff pods would be genuinely helpful against F-4s and other radar slingers. So honestly, it’d still be a helpful addition.
You must be special kind of kiddo.
Manuels shows any F-5 model is compatible with those countermeasure systems which means it can equip perfectly fine.
Same method used on İtalian F-104’s even tho they didnt recieved irl but because they were compatible.
On the other hand Show me single source that states T2 and F-1 did recieved that kind of modification or they are compatible.
Go on kiddo im waiting for Flare system documents.
You want your chaff pods? Sure go on and complain to Gaijin why they didnt already implemented it but crying about F-5C’s flare system is a very pathetic move tbh.
Again, show me where a single F-5C actually mounted them and I’ll show you what you ask for-
Right. You can’t.
And neither can I, because Gaijin holds Japanese tier VI to a weird version of historical authenticity where they can’t get their best armaments while getting zero countermeasures, while an American aircraft with twelve of them ever built gets flares it never mounted, a frustrating DM, and far better dogfight capability at the same BR lul
You’re such a arrogant child who constantly refusing to see the difference.
Does manuel states that F-5C is compatible with countermeasure systems? Yes.
Does any manuel states T-2 and F-1 is compatible or recieved any sort of flare systems? No and that is the biggest difference.
This method applied on many vehicles:
İtalian F104’s recieved countermeasure systems because manuel states they are compatible, German F-4F’s recieved Aim-9J’s because of same reason and this list goes and on and on.
But for some reason you’re crying about one single American vehicle even tho other nations also recieved the same treatment.
Man you hypocracy is something special i must say, it reminds me of famous German mains tbh.
1 Like
Do you have the manuals for the Mitsubishi T-2 and F-1? You seem to be an authority on them.
Edit: And because said manuals would also state it could mount the Sparrow 9Ls and 9Ms, if we’re going to be sticklers about manual this and manual that. I’d happily take a BR bump to 10.7 just for those, just to give F-5Cs the clapping they deserve :)