I misread this as the (in)famous “the 7M and 7M are exactly the same in-game” statement that got turned into a meme awhile back lmao
So it can suffer more against planes that has better armament, avionics and flight performance?
Its much better solution than decreasing its br to 12.0 or keeping in its current state at 12.3.
yeah, that is quite literally preferable
Yeah, no.
Yeah, its much healthier for the game to have one more mid jet than keep pushing compression downwards
1 Like
According to your personal opinion.
Just because you think like that doesn’t mean its true tho.
Point of saying this?
No, he is somewhat accurate
Adding extra compression is objectively bad
It never does anything to fix the game, were better off moving everything else up rather tham some vehicles down
5 Likes
F-4S and F-4FG1/FGR2 cannot be moved up to 12.3.
They’re exactly what a 12.0 should be.
F-18A is under-BR’d.
1 Like
Bruh (attempting) reading this gave me a brain hemorrhage. Anyone have a copy of the “Godzilla had a stroke trying to read this and fucking died” meme laying around?
still, based on the title, the missile and plane names, and context clues from other posts, I think this is talking about giving the F-20 AIM-7Ms, F-4S AIM-9Ms, and the F/A-18A some sparrow type as well.
Meaningless upgrade over what it has rn lmao
Never happening
Best 12.3 so why do that
Anyways necroposting.
1 Like
F20 just needs more CMs like all the dead F16s
I know but I think that’s what OP was saying. I think
Good luck finding source for that.
Just make it up ezpz
1 billion cm+ HMD+ Aim-9X+ Aim-120D and last but not least F-18E engine.
1 Like
Plenty of f16s carrying more than 45 CMs.
Also universal CM pods exist.
Also give that F-18 engine 20% channel gain cause why tf not
1 Like
Those are late block F-16’s.
It doesnt matter if you cant prove its compatibility with F-20.
1 Like
Hell yea.
Larry the J-16 destroyer.
1 Like