The F-4S should be moved up from12.0 to 12.3 just so it can get aim-9L and aim-7m bc the F/A-18a at at 12.3 has has aim-Ls and aim-7m so i don’t see why it would hurt moving it up from 12.0 to 12.3 i think its fair tbh and then with the f-20 all they got to do is give it 2 aim-7m bc why not f/a-18 has so io say it should get it and for the f/a18c should get aim-9m bc it would help[ the aircraft out in my opinion dose anyone else agree?
1 Like
it also has much better radar.
7M is, ingame, identical to 7F. you are just spewing bunch of nonsense.
1 Like
and there a tiny bit difference so why dose that matter if it gets then right so would barrel effect lie u said and also the f-4 would-be way better if it gets the aim-9l/aim-7m bc it gets uptier a fuck load to 12.0 and it suffers a fuck load so if it dose get those those u would suffer a bit less then if it didn’t have it
1 Like
im not reading such slab of text
I am genuinely struggling to read this as well
let me try to translate
(ngl it took me like 10 minutes to get his rambaling put into a coherent sentence)
Stay in school, kids. Sentence structure goes a long way.
6 Likes
is the F4S even compatible with the 7M and 9L? That aside, the F-4S is already versatile enough, you can load 5 AIM-7s and 2 AIM-9s with 2 napalm on the outer most pylons and you can do both base bombing and air to air duties. Giving the F-4S AIM-7Ms and AIM-9L would not be necessary
And in case people say the aim7m needs to be buffed
Its the other way around the aim7f is already modeled has being an aim7m so an accuracy change would make the aim7f worse
they are both modeled correctly as iirc the only difference between them IRL is their seeker
both still being CW seekers so there is no difference for WT
(there would only be a difference if gaijin one day models jamming)
Yea