The F-4S should be moved up from12.0 to 12.3 just so it can get aim-9L and aim-7m bc the F/A-18a at at 12.3 has has aim-Ls and aim-7m so i don’t see why it would hurt moving it up from 12.0 to 12.3 i think its fair tbh and then with the f-20 all they got to do is give it 2 aim-7m bc why not f/a-18 has so io say it should get it and for the f/a18c should get aim-9m bc it would help[ the aircraft out in my opinion dose anyone else agree?
1 Like
it also has much better radar.
7M is, ingame, identical to 7F. you are just spewing bunch of nonsense.
5 Likes
and there a tiny bit difference so why dose that matter if it gets then right so would barrel effect lie u said and also the f-4 would-be way better if it gets the aim-9l/aim-7m bc it gets uptier a fuck load to 12.0 and it suffers a fuck load so if it dose get those those u would suffer a bit less then if it didn’t have it
1 Like
im not reading such slab of text
3 Likes
I am genuinely struggling to read this as well
let me try to translate
(ngl it took me like 10 minutes to get his rambaling put into a coherent sentence)
Stay in school, kids. Sentence structure goes a long way.
14 Likes
is the F4S even compatible with the 7M and 9L? That aside, the F-4S is already versatile enough, you can load 5 AIM-7s and 2 AIM-9s with 2 napalm on the outer most pylons and you can do both base bombing and air to air duties. Giving the F-4S AIM-7Ms and AIM-9L would not be necessary
And in case people say the aim7m needs to be buffed
Its the other way around the aim7f is already modeled has being an aim7m so an accuracy change would make the aim7f worse
they are both modeled correctly as iirc the only difference between them IRL is their seeker
both still being CW seekers so there is no difference for WT
(there would only be a difference if gaijin one day models jamming)
Yea
Yes, the AIM-9L was standard armament on the F-4S as soon as it went through the conversion program from F-4J to F-4S. The only undocumented missile in use is the AIM-7M, but that wouldn’t make a difference in WT since the 7F and the 7M are the same in the game.
1 Like
I partially agree with him receiving the AIM-9L, he, along with planes like the FG.1/FGR.2 and F-4J UK, are simply sad to play, obviously, it’s not impossible, but you can’t rely on your AIM-9G/H. The problem with the F-4S receiving the AIM-9L and going to 12.3 is that the F-20 already fills that gap, and it would leave it ‘lost’ since people would prefer the F-20 for having absolutely everything better except for the number of missiles (I’m using a translator, sorry for any mistakes).
So after making a post complaining about people base bombing and me using the F-4S, I decided to play it as a fighter and I can say this thing annihilates. I went from getting maybe a base and a kill to consistent 2-3 kill games. The F-4S is an absolute missile chucking machine if used correctly, it doesn’t need new weapons, it’s perfect where it is. As DEFYN once said- “Finally a worthy premium?”
7M is not different from 7F
2 Likes
Ok, so just to be clear, you want the F4S to get the same missiles as the F/A-18A, so that it can be objectively worse than the F/A-18A but at the same BR?
i think the F4S is fine, just getting uptierd to 13.3 with ARH missels is just not cool. And people shoudnt really use napalm on it, a Aim7F in 11.3 BR is crazy, but still its just the BR problem that makes Jets like F/A -18A/C Bad, just SARH missels planes fighting against ARH missels planes?
I think F-20 could recieve Aim-9M’s in exchange for 12.7 Br rather than receiving same missiles.
1 Like
we dont need to keep adding more and more irccm planes to 12.7
1 Like