there is no production line tho lol
Your conclusions are so stupid
This is the most inconspicuous aircraft ever created. It is given out by the large sweep of the wing, which reduces radar visibility. Angular airframe shapes for scattering radio waves. Radar blockers at the entrance to the air intake. No moving parts of the engine nozzles. The flat bottom of the fuselage. RAM coating does not reduce visibility by 10 times
What make me having fun is the use of Stealth word → nothing is stealth, as many good nations can detect any “stealth” aircrafts from far away and easily.
1 Like
You are in abject denial of the reality. Technology progresses, and with it RCS technology and paint have become dramatically better.
agreed, LFRW are largely unaffected by RAM coatings of the 22 and 35. however weapons solutions are not possible with these RW hence the advantage of the low observability
F-22 is the technology of the 80s, the radar in the nose does not reduce the RCS in any way, but increases. The paint can not reduce the RCS by 10 times in any way. You can’t jump higher than your head. Physical limit reached
you did
please quote me
It has all these flat angles not because it’s ‘the best’ but because computers of the era were physically incapable of computing curves well.
F-22/F-35 were basically made to limit HRPF radar band, and low part of VHF band
Every other bands, such as MRPF/LRPF are capable of detecting those aircrafts earlier than would a HRPF one.
In the same way, and UHF/SHF/EHF also are capable of detecting it, yet the problem for those range is to have good electronics enough into the fired missile → that’s currently not efficient.
1 Like
They’ve never had bias to begin with.
RAM isn’t designed to reduce the RCS by 10x, who put that idea in your head?
And cats don’t give a toss about your “physical limit”; they will happily jump over 6x their length vertically.
Detection =! Fire solution. Limiting RCS of aircraft to tracking radar is just as crucial as lowering RCS to avoid detection in the first place.
If you detect it, you can guide it.
Today the simple point of detection made ability to guide and kill.
Link-16 / buddy “lighting” are both ways to make missiles being fired on LOAL mode with a continous guidance in form similar to automated AGM control like.
That’s what is capable MICA-EM for exemple, or Even Meteor missile,… those are Multimode Fox-3 missiles which are capable of LOAL aswell as Link16 guidance.
Therefore the simple fact of being detected, is enough to be fired upon.
some here claim that this is so? what do cats have to do with it? cats have a different body structure
“physical limit” = limit imposed by physics
“You cannot jump higher than your own head”
Except for you know, multiple animals that will do that all day. Or humans with a stick. Because pole vaulting is a thing. Along with trampolines. It turns out humans can jump higher than their own head.
RAM and minor airframe changes can make an F-15 sized aircraft appear like an F-16 sized aircraft on radar. Is that not enough of a reduction for you?
F-117’s “total sacrifice” to attain high stealth does not prove nothing can be stealthier, especially considering you ignore things unneeded (and thus, not sacrificed at all) for the role the F-117 was intended for.
1 Like
Lol, Lemao.
Picture very clearly relevant; yes? How dare someone refute your grade-school logic.
You’re the schoolboy. Are you writing some nonsense? what stick? If a person cannot jump taller than himself at the expense of his own muscles.Only some individual individuals sitting on drugs
1 Like
It can be seen that F-22 is worse, F-117, and sometimes B2
Source
Where I can agree that RAM coverage greatly reduces visibility. So this is the air intake channel