Fair enough, I saw this point discussed in the UK euro thread, well I guess it will be dev discretion once again.
Thank god i bought the hyperx pulsefire raid… it had 5 side buttons and was cheap asf
too bad its out of production now
I know what you said.
And im saying that just because something is unique to a plane doesnt mean that its less or more outdated. A unique feature doesnt have to be a good one or be desirable by others as i explained here.
1 Like
oh and it had 2 more buttons on the scroll wheel, you could tilt it left and right
1 Like
It’s supposed to hit IOC this year, but it’s only because of some technical issues. The missile has been around since early 2020’s IIRC. I believe it is the newest weapon the US will get
1 Like
What about JATM? Is it in low serial production as well?
We can go one by one but it will lead to nothing.
Each plane is used with its own capabilities and its own way.
Which is what someone should do if they want to point out how advanced something is. Just saying “its unique” doesnt tell anyone anything worthwhile in that regard.
Has cleared EOC but not IOC IIRC
1 Like
Almost certainly
1 Like
Ok thanks :)) hope to see it together with R77M and Pl-15 dual pulse buddies
1 Like
If you want details you can read it on you own in the su57 forum. I am sure there is more interesting info then i can explain.
As this is the f22 topic, i will respect that and will talking only about the f22 and su57 differences and not only the su57.
Thought this was Raptor thread, turns out i dived into international conversation that somehow ended up in F-22 thread, weird times.
2 Likes
I recommend you don’t talk to him, he’s the half brother of Tiger_tank
1 Like
Specifically asking about flight performance here, not its radar or weapons or stealth.
Would it be the fastest climbing and accelerating jet (better than the eurocanards)?
Would it be able to hold its own in duels with such jets, and if anyone has them, could you share reliable data on its turn rate etc?
1.27 TTWR (my calculations, 50% fuel, full air to air loadout, did nto consider installation loss for the engines so maybe a bit lower then 1.27 but still i believe it would be above 1.2)
22 STR and 37 ITR (british trails)
I believe Kizvy had posted it above, so let me quote it
Most likely due to high TTWR
@ILuvAnneHathaway
2 Likes
My calculations
2 Likes
You come to the WT Forums and expect threads to be on topic?
2 Likes
