from some document i read, the f22’s fuel efficiency is 0.3 compared to f100 0.35. but given the raptors super cruise capability it may alter it a bit or due to the difference in bypass ratios. we do know the f119 without nozzles is lighter and simpler than the f100 also without nozzles and that often points to efficiency. the raptors currently are getting a sustainment and update program where the engines may become a bit more efficient
on a side note the F22 raptor is my favorite fighter. its just very sleek and is a statement against time. long live the raptor
1 Like
yea i agree mostly because it’s still in use in the army of various nations so data are still classified, wich is comprhensible unless some mad meteor lover posts the meteor missiles data, it has hapened before but let’s hope not, Gaijin will only develop a missile on the data from previous ones but with longer range maybe.
Bets on MICA nerfs after Meteor comes?
I wouldn’t expect Meteor to make MICA get nerfed. That’s some kind of reverse wishful thinking.
1 Like
@quartas121
22 degrees sustained at mach .65 at sea level and 37!!! degrees instantaenous
not 100% accurate but i would bet gaijin will model it based off this
1 Like
Jesus, What the hell are they feeding them?
Is this supposed to be shared?
yeah its from the british national archives.
anyone can go inhere and take pcitures of the document
Why does it say UK??
1 Like
british, they were wanting to buy the f-22 at once point if Eurofighter didn’t work out
🥀…,.,…
b4 export ban
5 Likes
do you have in game figures for EF-2000 and Rafale for comparison?
This makes my head ache. Knowing how badly gaijin will ruin this aircraft.
How does that compare to EFT and Rafale
It’s better in every way.
1 Like
How good is the energy retention above 9km?
35 percent better specific excess power than the su-27 at 11km altitude
(basically ability to gain energy in altitude or turn)
2 Likes