F-16xl

Theoretically, you can send a couple (thousand) messages to Boeng, Lockheed Martin, etc. mail, saying like: "The russian developers from Gaijin systematically underestimates technical characteristics of __, the USA aircraft/ tank has a win rate of only 30-40%… There are hints that the company is cooperating with the Russian government… ".

If you succeed and the company you spammed pays attention to your letter, Gaijin faces AT LEAST a multimillion-dollar fine (U.S. copyright, section 501(b)).

1 Like

This talks a lot about f16XL and says it would’ve had the apg66 radar(page 82) and also yeah it talks about the AMRAAMs be mock ups and if I remember correctly we’re just bolted on or something like that. Also talks about their being two types of f16Xl one being a one seat version and the other being a 2 seat version

Spoiler


According to NASA, a lot of the inner parts were swapped to F-16C block 40 parts like the original F-16A block 10 Analog flight computer for the Block 40 DFLCCS

1 Like

From a lot of comments I read, they really don’t know anything about the XL variant. For one, it went up against the F-15E during prototyping and only lost by a very small margin. One main reason was the funding to swap the airframes for the Delta wing design was gonna be costly as heck.

Second the F-16XL mainly used Block 40 Inside avionics and parts. For example you can find in one of the NASA reports, it carried 5000 Ib’s more fuel on average to the F-16C, had 40% more external stores, and being able to have a tighter turn rate and same radar as the block 40. It even had better lift to thrust ratio making it have insane AoA authority.

images

2 Likes

yes

1 Like

ty

2x AIM-9Ls and 4x AIM-120As I don’t know if I really want this

well well well, it do be a event vehicle, doesn’t seem tho that it’ll be a premium plane, big suprise

Should be six AIM-120As if they really want to put it at 13.3.

1 Like

Watch it be at 13.0 because 4 AMRUMs. Not like IRIAF started at 13.0 and then was yeeted to 14.7 because people kept eating Fakours

1 Like

For some reason, I doubt it will go to 13.0 even with four AIM-120s max.

It’s an F-16 with less missiles than F-16ADF. Su-30MK2 is a Flanker with less missiles than Su-27SM. There is a substancial chance of F-16XL being 13.0

2 Likes

15CGE has been OP the whole time. Win Rate 53%←😂

I disagree with the F-15C GE being DOA the wole time, but it also was hardly OP on release.

Damn all these new jets with Fox 3s at 13.0/13.3 can we adjust the JAS39C down .3 BR?

seems like the F-16XL will be 13.0
image

So, it’s going to be 13.0.

Four AIM-120As as a maximum is no issue.