Please, if you wont run some matches in IRIAF then at least watch a tutorial or something, that jet is pretty good (not in a great state RN bc 13.0, but still)
I know. In order to increase the kb a bit (so I don’t get bot accusations). I just multipathed. It was very recent that I binded TWS/change targets lol.
Seems to have a better time in it than the F-15J(M) which I find odd.
I am probably worse at the br range of 11.0-12.7 br with SARH missiles bc I played toptier much and dodging is in theory the same but a little bit different…
In general just a bad remark on the aim9l. It is basically an aim9m with smoke and without irccm. There are worse missiles at 12.7 like the r60m or I think the aim9h on the f14a.
Let me see if I understand this correctly…
You’re saying that the f16A should be lower br (since he is already under br, just like f18a).
…and you’re trying to justify this using the stats of a niche plane that is 13.0 and uses a different loadout (6x 9m), and are you comparing this version of the f16 niche 13.0 with the standard f16A which is 12.3?
How many players have you seen using Belgian F16A?
The last time i saw someone using this plane was when the benelux subtree came into game.
Very few players use this vehicle. The half dozen players who use this vehicle must use it with great skill, because 13.0 planes often face up tiers against.
The netz which is the same plane as the f16A with python is 12.7 and has better combat statistics than the underBr f16A.
In fact, all nations that have access to the F16 have statistics equal to or greater than that of the United States. Is the problem really the F16?
…Or is it the US players who think that their vehicle will win the game alone, just the one with the USAF emblem?
If u are talking about the 12.3 ones, IDK what is realistically wrong, although I guess there are ways to justify them being 12.0. F16As with just 9Ms sits at 13.0 RN so no reason. Just to say, they are not even on the bad side of 12.3.