Has Derbies not been removed yet?
i just wanted to say my opinion that i wasnt sure is true. but ig you can say i did have some fun
i did know what he asked, i just made a simple joke but sure not everyone can be fun. and not everyone is english native speaker, its my 4th language daily, mistake happens.
which i do not mind but to come here and says this should have more right because is my country plane is pure hypocrit, and i am not talking about you.
you might be confused here, that was my remark for the EX 22 setup as only F15c had these dual rack CFT aim120
but i think that no one understood my point.
to put it simple, somehow we never seen them amram dual pylon on on the inner and outer pylon at the same time
It’s a double standard because they’ve always been treated differently to the rest of the fox 3s, throughout the history of buffs to fox 3s, Derby has traditionally gotten it’s buffs/reworks a patch or two later than the rest
On top of the fact that it’s been regarded as the worst fox 3 in game since launch and Gaijin refuse to add more advanced variants while everyone else gets R-77-1/AIM-120D/PL-12A etc
They will be removed in the next dev update
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/wJXCoSJwHBvK?comment=E83gPCTQ34RxGTnB46yMJenw

It’s :
here’s the answer
The ANG documents specifically named all 105 of their F-15’s as intended users. Do you even know what a Golden Eagle F-15 actually is?
Nice double standards. 16 fox 3 is 16 fox 3 and a once they get their rework they should be way better
Yeah saying, “I don’t think it’s a double standard.” was definitely not the right way to phrase that, instead I’ll say I think it is a very bare double standard.
And more simply the coincidental result or victim of circumstance due to other factors than Gaijin purposefully hating on the Derby specifically in my mind or holding it to a lower standard.
Still is a double standard though regardless if caused by other factors, so mb on phrasing, (and also it is dumb, and lazy how they have handle the derby’s though don’t get me wrong.)
Has it? i actually can’t fully recall.
On launch I definitely recall that being right because the AMRAAM was like on meth compared to everything, and the MICA was butchered I Believe. But after like the first half year when they then murdered the AMRAAM"s close end maneuverability, and decreased the drag on the base r-77 fins it was better than everything but the mica and r-77 and AAM-4 in the closer range fox 3 meta, (although maybe I’m getting that confused with the AAM-4.)
Either way they should get a buff although I don’t know enough about it to know what that really would improve .

what’s worse is I actually saw it when quoting myself to reply to MiikaL, and intended on fixing it after. Now it’s staying like that cause kinda funny, lol
was the program completed ?
the f15ge need the mrls to carry 12 not the ex…the outermost station has always been an option even on the f15e it could not use it because of the fcs…the fcs(avionics) on the f15ex is different hence why boeings standard amraam load is 12…thats without MRMLs
Outermost pylons are MRML, so his/her statement is correct
Did you just stop reading that paragraph after the first sentence??? who does that. literally the following sentence said what you pointed out they will be good ONCE they get their rework.
Where was this double standard, I said once the Derby’s go from being pretty much only good at MCM to a player threat after there rework, they should be restricted like the EX’s loadout unless they instead raise the EX AMRAAM count to 16 at that point in time instead.
MRML is separate to the Golden Eagle. A Golden Eagle is just an F-15C airframe that was in very good condition, that was prioritized for upgrades like the APG-63v3 and later ADCP II.
In they end ANG didn’t field the MRML but we know it works and we know they had at least a couple to put on their jets.
EPAWSS still not added is quiet annoying actually, If it does not have spherical RWR in live server I am gonna be so disappointed
how do u know that they had a couple to put on their jets ?
Because there are pictures of ANG F-15’s with MRML
can u post anything else other than that one showoff model ? anything that is actually in the air ?
There are a couple other pictures, but all on the ground. Doesn’t matter though, since we have the documents, and know MRML is flying on F-15EX/SA/QA
again nothing proves that they have backward compatability other than a showoff model (which isnt an f15GE) , we dont even know if the program went through fully based on your document. so 105 f15C have mrmls yet theres not a single picture of them flying with it ?