because those extra racks couldnt possibly be used for 120s instead of 9ms if they wanted to, right…
i wonder if there is anything similar for the flankers
there is prob a lot of different examples but im glad he brought that one up tbh
because it can technically bring them so why not? No need for the “no need to give it more missiles, it’s BR would go up”, because we have Custom BR’s now.
its even funnier when you realize that this guy supports those with the reasoning being that its the same pylons for IR and AMRAAMs there
you know, just like MRML
lmao typical, “rules for thee but not for me”
i believe that everyone should get racks that their planes “technically” could take, su30s get their double racks, f15s get their mrmls, euros with their dual racks, etc. it makes everyone more competitive at the cost of there just being more missiles flying around
and even more so now since we have dynamic brs, they can easily give all of these planes lower brs at the cost of them losing a few missiles, though i still think we’d need a 15.3 or even 15.7 max br first
I’m more than happy for all dual pylons to be removed lmfao.
I’ll cook in the rafale.
it also has 2 extra ARH missiles…
French F3s could only use 6 micas

yea i think only the f4 got those extra pylons iirc?
iirc they had the pylons, but werent set up for mica on them
oh alright, i forget the specifics but ik it wasnt really supposed to take 8 micas
ok, good talk.
well F-15C GE and F-15EX would still retain theirs as there is more evidence for those specific jets. EFT and flankers would lose them though probably
its really funny how there is more evidence for AMBER than for some options in game
22 missile F-15EX is more real then them
i wish the ex would get an option to take the litening 3 as well, the sniper is so bad for shorter range engagements
or maybe they could change the sniper so it doesnt have a stupid 20x min zoom

