Su57 also has L band arrays to supplement the radar. Though it isnt reliable for weapons guidance.
There is 0 doubt in my mind the APG-85 is a better radar than the Su57s
1 Like
Cope
Posting a random snippet from unknown origin and an unknown time without revealing the source and time is surely a move.
2 Likes
It’s from a CIA report from the 80s or 90s about the F-117 and stealth aircraft in general and how many numbers have been guessed in the media, and how that’s good for disinformation.
It’s also entirely irrelevant to what I posted as they specifically don’t mention any numbers, but what do you expect from a zogbot
2 Likes
look like your the one coping here
The one with sources is coping?
Did I stutter?
2 Likes
It doesn’t, that’s a myth that comes from google translate translating array to radar, those are IFF antennas, a real L band radar needs to have a diameter several meters. The Su-57 has a single main X-band radar in the nose and 2 small auxiliary X-band radars on the cheeks.
1 Like
Bringing this back to the F15EX, any guesses on how the AN/APG-82(V)X will handle stealth? That seems like the likely upgrade coming for lot 9.
the source is not the problem here.
the problem here is you think the word reduced rcs added to a identical aim9x blk1 missile thinking is 100% stealthy.
you can say what you feel, blk1 and blk2 are identical in look and body, its hard to trush the word rcs in it.
you can cope
we dont do that in my region, maybe your americans can tell me how it feel
I was about to ask, your post was about the F-35 and 9X right?
How is a 80s/90s document about the F-117 supposed to be the silver bullet reply to that when both the F-35 and 9X are way newer.
1 Like
Coupled with Tigereyes/Legion/Sniper XR should be comparable to EF-2000 and Rafales counter stealth abilities.
GaN is more of an advantage in being able to do multiple operations at the same time, IE jam and search at once
1 Like
It’s still pretty impressive HOBS tho
the missile itself is impressive, but its hard to trust the word reduced rcs in any way
1 Like
The CAPTOR-E too is better than the radar of the Su-57, it’s slightly bigger and also doesn’t have the broadband capability of the F-22 and 35 radars but the gimball gives it a big advantage over the Su-57.
Except they aren’t. BLK II+ is specifically stated as using different construction for reduced RCS. I cant fix stupid if you can’t read.
You’re certainly not displaying any aversion to it in your intelligence.
I’m just more or less referencing the picture
is this why the soviets introduced fighter ESA radars 25 years before the americans?
also aren’t you the same guy who said russian ARMs arent coming because they are useless and they don’t have any wideband ones?
You should probably stop with the insults before a forum mod comes in here