It does:
& do you have proof that all F-15EX program vehicles cannot obtain MAW?
Realism > national biases in purchasing decisions.
4 Likes
Wtf why lantirn why not litening 2 or 3
4 Likes
do you have a picture of it using one of those IRL?
its almost like that plane doesnt exist yet so devs can do whatever they feel like
1 Like
They could atleast give it a better tgp because the lantrin sucks for ground strike and it would make more sense to give the f15ia the litening 2 or 3 so it atleast has a good tgp to use i could be asking for the litening 5 witch is a sniper competitor
Empty weight?
That’s the F/A-18 MLU, not the F-18 op was referring to
The f18 for Finland the normal one was strictly air to air until the mlu 2 right?
I have made a bug report for the EPAWSS I believe I saw another one as well. Mine is linked.
F-15EX EPAWSS Bug Report
Unreportable at this time.
Better to find maximum gross weight without CFT and fuel tanks.
@SBUA_syvash
There was no technical capability for the first Finish F-18, so mentioning it would be known as a false equivalence fallacy.
These people are talking about technical capability aircraft, not whatever mentioning an aircraft with no air to ground wiring to speak of does.
Yeah they dont realize why they removed the a out of the name for it because it lost its ground attack capabilities and turned into a fighter only
The renderings of it have the litening pod on it i think
1 Like
Same aircraft^
Provisions and pre-existing sensor locations still exist. Technical compatibility is applied in this case.
5 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Yes, the sensors are removable, shocker…
