F-15CGE should get 12x AAMs via MRML racks

with the flankers dual pylons, the dual pylons on EFT, and the J10C having the pylons it does

even AMBER would not be a new precedent, if anything there is more evidence for AMBER than other pylons being added to the game

1 Like

I am now half expecting Su-30MKI to have double rack R-77s if introduced.

Again, I do not oppose this standard they’ve shifted toward. I don’t really care what that rules are on this matter, only that they’re applied to everything.

tbh now i want f=15ex with 16x amraam

3 Likes

if they give F15C MRML they kinda have to give it to EX, so that will be 16

now if they also add AMBER it will be 20

3 Likes

22, since AMBER can go on the middle one exclusive to Strike Eagles and Advanced Eagles iirc

exactly what im thinking

1 Like

So which one is it Alvis?

One is talking about assets that aren’t missiles or guns themselves.
The other is talking about weapons.

Both quotes are correct as neither has anything to do with the other.

It is… It was always about compatibility. It doesn’t set a new precedent. Prove it’s compatible and it can be added.

I don’t support MRMLs, I just don’t oppose MRMLs.
There’s a difference there.

It’s like me with the Javelin consuming 0.66TSFC on afterburner.
I don’t oppose that enough to find out if it’s a bug or not.

And in the case of the OP 800HP engine on funny event tank.
I don’t oppose it enough to find out the actual power of the engine.

There’s complacency/content, support, and opposition.
Most of the time I’m in the complacency camp unless a rule is hinted at being violated for one instance.

And how does this answers my original statement?

hello guys is there any latest info about golden eagle’s MRML?

3 Likes

3 Likes

now put all the new aircraft to 14.7 please so that the old 14.3s arent completely powercrept into oblivion

2 Likes

well, i doubt that 18E should go to 14.7

1 Like

Il dittatore >

1 Like

ofc

Gaijin as always. They modeled LAU-128 for MRML, but base rails still LAU-7 from Phantom incompatible with both amraam and BOL

1 Like

In the dev server the f15cge now has the MRML pylons/