check files not stat cards or xray
That’s not just a stat card thing, static trust and climb rate is usually correct for stat cards.
In a test drive with a stock F-15C MSIP II I get 7928kgf of static thrust while ramming my plane against a building going full afterburner
F-15C ingame engine got a little tune down since the factory who made it stated that the improved F-100-PW-200 mainly for more effiency, cheaper to produce/maintain and fixing minor issuses.
Context:
Reliability and maintenance costs were also drastically improved, and the engine incorporates a digital electronic engine control (DEEC). The -220 engine produces static thrust of 14,590 lbf (64.9 kN) in military (intermediate) power and 23,770 lbf (105.7 kN) afterburning, very slightly lower than the static thrust of the -100/200, but the -220 has better dynamic thrust across most of the envelope.
The F100-PW-100 is a bit stronger but not so realiable. Idk bout the baz
Ok that makes sense, but why the difference between USA and Israeli F-15C variants when they have the same engine?
No clue, either way something is indeed wrong.
F100-PW-220 engines are stronger at speed than PW-100s.
What discrepancy?
Cause there is none between F-15C and F-15 Baz Improved.
Have they fixed it?
There was never an issue as far as I know.
Then again, I only checked at the time of my first post made here, which may be a different version of the game you were on.
I just download a patch now, but nothing is changed.
They have the same engine but different thrust, and as such, the F-15C MSIP has lower climb rate and lower performance in general
They’re identical in performance.
I’d verify files if I was you.
I don’t know how to datamine that stuff. But there’s definitely a discrepancy in game, even if it’s just stats/wrong engine name for baz. Most likely there’s actually a difference in performance
The F-15C and F-15C Baz Mshupar have identical FMs.
IDK, but mostly like it just underperforming, if compare with F-15A
15C must have better thrust and smaller power pit
Spoiler
I tested that some days ago and indeed the F-15C engines produce less static thrust but a bit higher thrust at above mach with more fuel consumption too, but increase in thrust is like around 400kgf per engine which is not meaningful when you get a far heavier plane with similar thrust below mach.
I don’t know why the Israeli F-15C has more power while having the exact same engines.
I think the best version in-game is the japanese one, stronger engines than the American F-15C and shares the same radar with marginally better missiles too
-100 have better power on all speeds until 1.6 mach
Or smth like that