I know we’ve been asking a lot about the F-15C GE, but since the dev server is very close to closing I’m most curious about the following issues and whether they’re on the table or not:
Receing partial EPAWSS, specifically 360° MAWS RWR coverage. Two units tested this, so it would not be unprecedented considering top tier aircraft like the EF and Rafale have 360° RWR coverage.
Receiving detailed NCTR. The AN/APG-63(V)3 is quite a modern AESA radar, so it would make sense to have comparable features to other modern radars.
Receiving the FM buff for the F-15C family of aircraft as they are not performing accurately. This would further allow the F-15C to perform its dedicated Air Superiority role by allowing it to dogfight more effectively.
Of course I have no expectations for these to come all at the same time. But confrimation or denial of these issues, potentially with a timeline/timeframe for ones that are planned on being added, would be very helpful.
hmm can you elaborate? the r-77 hits targets at the ranges its supposed to(at least taking the marketing at face value) with ease, it makes full utilization of those 50gs its rated for, r-77-1 pulls slightly worse than r-77 but i chalk that up to the compression from the very powerful motor
Hey. Both of these two have open suggestion reports. As there is no dev response to them, there is unfortunately no ETA to provide at this moment in time.
The sustained turn report is being reviewed by the developers. However it may not be before the major, it too currently has no ETA at this moment in time.
Sorry to rant, smin, but what’s there even to review at, when the F-15’s (family) FM is underperforming than it is supposed to, this was passed 1 year ago on the bug reports
When both the APG 63 v1 and V3 is missing NTCR on the radars, this bug reports that was passed 8 months ago for the APG-63 (v1) and this past for APG-63 (V3) ,and still wasn’t fixed when the APG63 (V3) was radar model is fixed, still got copied paste of APG 63 V1 radar data/ technical details.
What’s the point of adding a ESA F15’s when is it just simply a copy paste version of the F15C MSIP ll with no actual improvement, over it only getting a Bol pod, and ESA radar that doesn’t give more details on the planes
HUD displays and JMCHS HMD, bug reports that was passed.
I know this is only the dev server, but I feel like Developers only rushed the F-15C GE to be release before end of this year, with December, of other nations getting their own ESA radars. This is simply not a way to rush a vehicle like a halve baked potato that only sat in the pot for 15 mins
Sincerely, if these FM changes get added it’ll make the F-15C feel much more comfortable.
Partial EPAWSS is an iffy addition since it was only tested on 2 units, so I’d be able to live without it.
The only other thing I would really urge the devs to look at is NCTR. It does not make sense for the APG-63(V)3 to have such rudimentary NCTR when it’s one of the most modern F-15 radars out there, second only to the APG-82(V)1 afaik.
As expected, new dev server update, and the F-15C GE is still untouched and nowhere near a valid sidegrade to even the F-15E in the air superiority role. A fancy radar and BOL isn’t enough to cut it. Looks like Gaijin really believes the GE is something worth playing lmao.
To all who believed in Gaijin fixing the GE to make it 14.3 worthy:
