Imagine believing they’ll ever add those 4 extra missiles 😂😂😂
1 Like
I’m convinced it was just pr it’ll never get MLMR despite having to face rafale eurofighter and su30sm
MLMR and FM buff would make it a decent 14.3 as of now it’s barely an upgrade over the f15c and a sidegrade to the f15e
Seeing how much the US wins in some of the BR and balance changes lately I wouldn’t be suprised if Gaijin adds the MLMR if it performs truely bad.
Idk, if they give it a good skin the F-15C GE could convince me to actually play top tier US air again. Although I would still love to see it get the flight model buff.
every f15 but the f15j(m) currently have a negative win rate, the 14.0 f15s have a negative kill per death ratio and I think it’s bc they have to face 14.3 more often
And that is my main argument about being skeptical on the F-15C GE getting any major improvement. Gaijin hasn’t cared enough about the F-15 series all the way back since the F-15A/J/Baz in 2023 when it had issues with random wing snaps. It took them several weeks of fierce community feedback (both dev server and live update) to get it fixed. Not to mention their radar still losing lock at unmaneuvering enemies while shooting the unreliable AIM-7M in big 2025.
And those were some of the reasons of why I only believe in Gaijin when I see things in game, their forum promises have a significant chance to be just glorified PR.
This is the type of behavior that make people think Russian bias is real. F15C GE is currently missing nctr and FM buff at the minimum I think they haven’t touched it at all on the dev server since they added BOL bc the missing pylon is still there
At the very least they fixed the radar not updating targets outside of the search zone
3 Likes
The problem is that we don’t know what metric Gaijin uses to balance vehicles.
The US has been on both end of those questionable balance decisions. Maybe if fhey came out and stated what stats they look at things would become more clear.
That’s only for the Kfir and F-15EX/F-16V though. American jets like the F-15C GE/F-16C/F-15E primarily use JHMCS or Thales’ Scorpion HMD (for A-10C and F-22 currently being fitted and/or in service).
Ok so i did it with kfir right
We need to tank F-15C GE winrates so gaijin gives it its deserved MRML pylons
Why would you wanna beat those. That’s like saying you wanna beat the allegations of being a Michael Jackson listener.
Can we get 12 120 missiles?
m1a1 getting forgottent behind is a bit of a stretch its going to 11.7 this patch afaik
Not just the M1A1 being forgotten in the last 5 BR changes, the M1A2 stays 12.0 while worse tanks were moved to 12.3 and the CLAWS gets to stay 12.3 while the Spyder got yeeted to 12.7.
This is a bit off topic, but the US won the most with the last “decompression”.
2 Likes
I think most of what you’re using as examples isn’t America winning but minor nations getting shafted as usual. M1a1 Is op as hell(I’m using it in a 12.0 lineup and it’s plenty effective)
2 Likes
How are GRB winrates and US compression related to the upcoming F-15C GE’s mediocre performance?
Goes to both @_Renzo and especially you who brought the M1A1 out of nowhere.
Well some people disagree that Gaijin would buff a US vehicle if it performs too bad for their liking.
The above were only examples of this not being true, if a US vehicle suffers Gaijin buffs it like any other non minor nation vehicle. F-15C GE won’t be an exception.
The above were examples of top vehicles of their BRs, not examples of being exactly true. While the M1A2 is a much more reasonable complain and should be 12.3 at the very least, the M1A1 has no business on going above 11.3 as its a glorified M1 Abrams with 120mm, slightly better turret cheek protection, good round and reload time (inherited by the tank series).
Both M1A1 and IPM1 are no way near 11.7 material, period.
If you’re going to derail the topic, at least have the decency to have compelling evidence and narrative backing you up.
1 Like
The M1A1 is absolutely criminal at 11.3 lol, but that in depth discussion is for another topic.