Community Bug Reporting System hoping this will be enough to get the ball rolling, though I think it would have gotten it before live regardless
14 Likes
I pray it gets implemented
2 Likes
I think it was, I just wanna make sure
Not beating the f15 guy allegations
1 Like
I’m innocent I swear
2 Likes
yeah，i hope they can complete this .
Cockpit is also wrong/ outdated
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/1TNEGOdnPI5q
To go along with the PAD being incorrect
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/N8dr6T39g8eC
2 Likes
In my humble opinon, this is what we will get:
Live update [It’ll come reasonably or completely finished]:
- BOL pods.
- Radar.
Might come in the future [It’s fixed/minor update or within a big update]:
- EPAWSS.
- F-15C FM rework.
- Legion IRST
Pure copium [They’ll likely never deliver for “whatever” reason]:
- MLMR pylons.
- AMBER racks.
In conclusion: Still mid.
8 Likes
I don’t understand why they’re so against MLMR pylons from the get go this thing is supposed to compete against typhoon rafale and su30sm 2 of them having a higher missile count and rafale just has the fox3 with the best seeker in the game
2 Likes
Typhoon is already lacking missile count
4 Likes
How many is missing
4x missiles VIA double pylons (which are currently sat in the files) and that translates into an extra 2 AMRAAMs over the current 6x count
6 Amraams → 8 Amraams
1 Like
do you have a source for the 35 and 45 degree values? i am trying to collect info on it to try to make a bug report.
1 Like
You forgot the 2 extra amraams that are theoretically possible on the inner wing pylons
And then there is the render of the ‘beast mode’ with 16 meteors
What’s funny is re-fixing the flight model is only needed because of the thrust changes last major update.
The new drag & thrust profile screwed up the STR at lower speeds.
If GeneralLee didn’t make the report I would’ve.
That’s insane, every source (secondary ones) I found before confused them, this really shows that you can’t trust what you read online lol… I did know that the F-15Cs were being retrofitted with AESA, but nowhere did anyone mention that it was under the GE program. That’s insane
i don’t have any documents that state the exact figure but you have the image of the increment upgrades. Which notes a upgrade to the control section in the C-5
you can also source videos of live fire testing as well as any other amraam maneuvering documentation.
here is some stuff that may be helpful like the creator of the pl12 saying the aim120C-5 is a 50G missile (when using dual plane controls) 国产最先进主动雷达空空导弹权威报告——访SD-10空空导弹副总设计师梁晓庚 - 道客巴巴
Korean study which show cases the aim120B
치사율 평가를 위한 공대공 미사일 모의 발사 프로그램 개발 - 한국항공우주학회지 - 한국항공우주학회 : 논문 - DBpia
over the shoulder weapons require a bunch of fin aoa as they dont have much airspeed to try and turn
Raytheon develops over-the-shoulder AMRAAM | News | Flight Global
this image of aim120 ranges, looks russian to me
and finally a offically not acceptable source but still good data. they limit the missile to 30 degrees of aoa, fin AOA and missile AOA are seperate though
http://www.zaretto.com/sites/zaretto.com/files/missile-aerodynamic-data/AIM120C5-Performance-Assessment-rev2.pdf
1 Like
i would not trust russian charts on amraam data especially since we have british unclassified docs for amraam a/b
also amraam is not the only missile that’s nerfed in fin aoa, other missiles are also underperforming in aoa (cough r-77 cough) and for that we actually have hard data from its patent for its fins
3 Likes
First ‘Golden Eagle’ F-15C for USAF Air National Guard | Aviation International News the name predates the 2040 program by about 5 years :)
5 Likes
Hey @Smin1080p_WT
I know we’ve been asking a lot about the F-15C GE, but since the dev server is very close to closing I’m most curious about the following issues and whether they’re on the table or not:
-
Receing partial EPAWSS, specifically 360°
MAWSRWR coverage. Two units tested this, so it would not be unprecedented considering top tier aircraft like the EF and Rafale have 360° RWR coverage. -
Receiving detailed NCTR. The AN/APG-63(V)3 is quite a modern AESA radar, so it would make sense to have comparable features to other modern radars.
-
Receiving the FM buff for the F-15C family of aircraft as they are not performing accurately. This would further allow the F-15C to perform its dedicated Air Superiority role by allowing it to dogfight more effectively.
Of course I have no expectations for these to come all at the same time. But confrimation or denial of these issues, potentially with a timeline/timeframe for ones that are planned on being added, would be very helpful.
3 Likes