F-15 Eagle: History, Performance & Discussion

1 Like

definitely seems like it then. lemme go try this in game though rq just to verify

correction Vmax seems close for the right altitude a bit slow but not too bad, but VNE still seems off

actually still a bit low at the higher altitude

image

you are using the wrong graph in statshark
image

ok?

that one still shows too low Vmax and VNE


image

and it does so for the whole ebvelope
which is alot easier than permanently changing the altitude for the engine performance chart

I can’t hit 2.4 mach at 45 thousand feet, just tried it. flew for like 3 minutes straight.
on denmark
image


(converted everything to metric)

oh, then it is definitely under preforming

because if I am reading it right you should still have almost 1 km/h per second CAS acceleration at that point after hitting 2.4 with a maximum of 2.42

statshark also has a graph for that

image

is it though? its the same br as the kfir c10


image

APG-65 better in-game as well.

I forgor

Are you sure? C.10 has a whole ASEA radar dude.

At 12.7

At 12.7 we have premium Swiss Hornet that actually has better radar.


It hits 2.4, just at the wrong alt

2 Likes

TECHNICALLY it’s missing 0.02 mach of top speed, and it also hits it at the wrong alt, but there is no point in bug reporting it, gaijin doesn’t care about performance this high up…

thats fair

what was more confusing to me was the VNE though

because why would it be different between F15C and E

and doesnt gaijin normally set VNE to higher than IRL, in which case even the F15E VNE would be too low