Why not just use its own charts? You should be able to find it online.
Here are some of them: F-15E and F-15I should go to 14.0+ - #126 by Giovanex05
Export ones can have additional hardware/software for compatability
i mean all the mounting and wiring is standardized, at worst its a software update away from being able to use JSOWs
also F-15E has been tested with JSOW but they never put them into full use
Those graphs aren’t what I was talking about. But they do bring up another point. If someone says a plane’s turn is overperforming, they just increase its drag and reduce its thrust to match at one specific altitude, which makes the top speed even worse in the process.
What is the significance of this?
I am guessing it outlines a lot of implemented and planned modernizations, giving us a proof for certain capabilities for some aircraft that we would have otherwise not have, as they are still modern and their manuals are classified.
1 Like
You are absolutely right.
1 Like
the aim 7m, aim 7f still missing fully locked targets in a head on.
It’s super easy to out roll a sparrow
1 Like
*at specific point
Initially (on the early F-15As and Bs) they were present back in the late 70s, but they got removed due to issues with maintenance. The same happened for the F-15E
1 Like
Why it is prohibited to take AIM-7 with fuel tanks?
At least,the level flight speed at normal battle altitude is in line with expectations.
The test flight is consistent with “std day”+“0g”.
2.40.0.65 test flight modified the fm code, increasing the speed of broken(to mach3, ias 2000kph).
However, the new problem is that the maximum flight speed on paper of the F-15E in the game is up to 2700kph,which is actually impossible to achieve.Maybe they need to modify the data card.
1 Like
I was was decelerating at Mach 1.1 at 57,000ft so it’s missing a lot of power at high altitudes.
What configuration did you have and what configuration you are comparing to?
To qualify as STD means to be weak, STD is 84.99°F temperature, which is not that high in most maps.
There is overperformance slightly in acceleration at 40k feet until mach 2 where it begins to match the curve better. Performance is above that seen in STD -10 until mach 1.65
I suppose you are still correct, this is not unusual for Gaijin when adding NATO aircraft.
The acceleration curve from mach 0.8 to 1 is too steep, continues to be too steep until it is overperforming the chart at mach ~1, continuing to accelerate too quickly (as much as 5 seconds too quickly) up to mach 1.6.
3 Likes