Yes, it is 9G
3 Likes
9*1.5=13.5
2 Likes
Update on the progress of a potential F-15 HMD suggestion, found more supporting evidence if people want to follow along or help out.
Found more data on the D-1 Type Captive Test Unit, (AIM-95 surrogate), I think i should have enough to prove that Honeywell HMS was tested with the F-15.
Excerpt is from *in progress* DM's with Gunjob.
Did find this on the AIM-95 surrogate (D1 type Captive Test Unit) that was used during the testing
But I think it’s a bit ambiguous as it only directly mentions the AN/AVG-8 w/ F-14A directly[PDF page #8], though would theoretically be supported by the above excerpt.
Though there is detailed schematics for an F-15[PDF page #15 &-24] (and A-7, of which a have another primary source that confirms that the A-7 was HMS certified; the F-16 HMS study [PDF page #18]) to be fitted with the CTU, so it would follow that similar capability ?may? have been fitted to support the D-1 type seeker trials on the F-15, though as both the F-14A and A-7E are USN airframes, and the F-15 a USAF there is still some doubt, at least in my mind.
6 Likes
Do you want the overload increased or not? I’m confused now
1 Like
Here’s something from AIMVAL stating F15 (&F14) pilots used VTAS
https://web.archive.org/web/20120224090901/http://combatace.com/blog/5/entry-33-acevalaimval-lessons-learned/
3 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
18 Likes
No I couldn’t find anything about it on what I have atm
1 Like
Unfortunate. Worth the try though. Thanks.
No, that was just the TF-15A. 1974 preproduction for testing
I already have an article, I was just looking for stronger supporting evidence of it since I’m yet to find any direct evidence that F-15 mounted the HMS, only circumstantial though with two primary and two secondary that support its at least a non-Zero change since they are practically a paired system for worthwhile HOBS tests.
2 Likes
It’s probably based off the 1974 TF-15A SAC, [PDF page #5] which claims 7.33G is the Design Limit Load Factor, not the Structural Limit.
1 Like
Yeah, also from the TF manual you see the limit
ON normal you see it but its without OWS( the warning voice) the limit to keep was 7.3Gs
Not structural at all
2 Likes
Who cares about the F-15 flight model lol. Its a 1972 era jet with missiles made in the 70s against a Jet made in 1985 with 6 missiles made from the 1990s.
Its Dead on Arrival. 4 Aim7M versus 6 R-27ERs? Its not even a contest. Just a Russian bias rigged carnival game. I told you long ago that the F-15 would be the F-15A Early with the flight model of a concrete brick, a 1960s microwave for a radar with incomplete modes, and missiles from 1970. I called this years ago. Which is why im not even surprised or upset. I just see it for what it is…
…A rigged Russian bias carnival game.
9 Likes
Fact check mostly false:
AIM-9M is from 1982 :P
But seriously, yeah it just isn’t going to be competitive, it’s a worse F16 that trades two IR missiles for two bad SARH missiles.
1 Like
Su-27 flew in '77 a year after the F-15 entered service
1 Like
I do. So what if it does get bodied in a 1 circle and lags behind in weaponry? I don’t care about having the most powerful plane. I care about having a plane that feels like an F-15, and the current one does not. Fixing the structural integrity would help with that.
Also the more I fly it, the more I feel like it’s missing engine power somehow. Stock it has 55.4kN dry and 78.6kN with afterburner, both per engine. I don’t know what it is currently in a spaded form, but if it is less than 65.2kN dry and 100.5kN with afterburner this might be an actual issue. If not I’m just imagining things and Boeing is lying about flying Mach in a vertical. And I know it couldn’t do that anyways after a certain altitude, but not being able to at all seems weird to me.
10 Likes
I’ll test it when I’m able to, but I’m fairly certain people are going to think it’s less impressive than it was in their head. Part of the reason for this is the overperforming F-16 FM.
I’ve always been saying the F-15 will be a direct side-grade to the F-14 as well.
1 Like
In my opinion, if F-15J gets AAM-3, it would only be fair for the F-15A to get either AIM-95, or AIM-7P (or both since US made the damn aircraft)
1 Like
I do think instantaneus turn is underperforming.
I’m only getting lower values than the maximum usable in the SAC.
Spoiler
On other news the underperforming wing strenght has already been reported.
10 Likes