F-15 Eagle: History, Performance & Discussion

Also on another note the F-15 HUDs have some major issues, so I have several bug reports out to fix them and will be making more.

To start off with, the F-15E/I have incorrect HUD symbology for A2A missiles and this has already been accepted: Community Bug Reporting System

F-15A/C/J family of planes have the same issue: Community Bug Reporting System

The F-15E/I have the wrong symbol for alpha: Community Bug Reporting System

The F-15A/C/J family of planes are missing numerous hud symbology, including the shoot queue, radar range to target, steering point for missiles (lead indicator) and the breakaway symbol: Community Bug Reporting System

So if y’all wouldn’t mind upvoting and sharing these, I’d appreciate it. Hoping to get these fixed by next major update. More on the way too :)

5 Likes

To illustrate how much thrust is lost to drive the generators, hydraulic pumps, air cooling, pressurization, etc. The installed thrust of the F-15A was approximately 18,808 pounds and that of the more modern F-15C was approximately 19,300 pounds.

Can the outer wing stations on EX handle the dual GBU-53 racks used by Super Hornets? And does USAF have any of these dual racks?

im pretty sure right now they are only rated for air to air missile racks

Well they can take HARM as well, so I think it’s a possibility

Super hornets are using BRU-55, havent seen any on F-15

1 Like

USAF have dual racks for F-16, but for F-15 i cant remember such.

They meet the weight restrictions, but the ability to carry anything other than 88 or 120 was not stated.

1 Like

stormbreaker-900x600

Probably. They do have racks that can accommodate up to 4 GBU-39/53s or JAGM-Fs

We talk about this pylon

1 Like

I know, but you said that the F-15 does not have a dual pylon for the GBU-53 like the Hornet does.
In theory it should be able to carry some small bombs pylons 1 and 9 too. The limit for those should be at least 500 (1100 lbs) kilos if you take the HARM that is approx. 360 kilos (800 pounds) and add the pylon too. The Dual AMRAAM rack should weight about the same.
One Stormbreaker is 200 lbs or 100 kilos, so, in theory, you would be able to equip the 53 on those stations

Although they were already on the first F-15, their use was only made possible by the new control system on modern F-15s.

so before, it was just built with the extra pylon in mind? and it took them like 40 years to actually use it?

Initially it was made for additional ECM pods. There is even photo from trials.

But thise pylons caused instability and other problems so wasn’t used.

New FbW and harder wing allow to reactivate them and use.

4 Likes

The pylon was not used mainly because of the observed problems with lateral stability and, to a lesser extent, because of the high wingtip stresses. The first meant great sensitivity to the aircraft’s lateral balance which the pylon made very bad with armament. Second, the F-15 does not have a movable leading edge, instead using a variable camber fixed leading edge. The wingtip is very curved and there was rapid damage and wear in this area that was worsening the pylon.

5 Likes


Proposed SEAD version of F-15C.
Also was planned to use outboard stations.

4 Likes

good thing we can sort of get this if we get F-15E 85-183 or any advanced eagle

1 Like

Yeah, i know.

F-15E 86-0183 possibly will be only with PW-220.

yeah ik but it has a bunch of cool test stuff, it has the outer pylons