So they’re just variants of the LJDAM? Why wouldn’t the normal one work? To my knowledge the LJDAM was available in 2005 which is before the Tomcats retired.
No, they are GPS enhanced variants of the Paveway III kits.
Never mounted as EGBU’s were already in stock and the F-14 was effectively already being killed off by '98 due to the AIM-54D / AIM-152 program falling though and missiles not being remanufactures to prevent the motors from aging out of service.
EGBU-24 on F/A-18C Late already.
I didn’t see “mounting them in service” as criteria. If it didn’t even require any software I fail to see why it couldn’t be added…
If that is the criteria we might even see the JSOW for them too, as it is technically possible.
Idk, everything I have says 2008 for air force and navy a bit later
Does anybody here have the empty weight of the F15EX?
If Su-30SM can get double rack from Su-35S, why F-15C can’t get rack from F-15EX?
We even have something.
From F-15C, single seat
Even more realism…
Nothing official. Around the same as the E
FBW will make it more maneuverable tho
No HPRF minimum range for F-15 radar
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/C4DzKl6zKyDN
so if F15A was stripped down and set time to climb records what if you strip down f15E and tried as it has better ones
F-15E missing bombs?
The bol pods??
The missing range on the radar???
It is still competitive don’t get me wrong but these are some nice HISTORICAL things to see.
(and they won’t make the eagle op either)
Which one? GBU-53? Or LJDAM/EPaveway?
It’s hard to prove that they are on the F-15E. But… Twin pylons for the Su-30 are no less hard to prove.
They would be covered either as the discrete ALE-58, or integrated into the LAU-128B/A.
The LAU-128B/A includes the AN/ALE-58 BOL Countermeasures Dispenser integrated into the launcher.
Yeah, I know about it. But we still need to prove that the F-15E carried BOL. Alas. We have a strange thing with BOL. The F/A-18C should have them too, but as you can see from the dev…
The above linked Marvin Engineering products pages references both the LAU-128B/A & F-15E by name.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Than idk. Maybe one billion of chaffs is too OP.
For dev, this site does not seem to be an argument. “All photos show F-15A/C”. Funny.
Saab’s website also mantioned just “F-15”.