F-14 Tomcat: History, Performance & Discussion

Big F

1 Like

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/4F5UNwWpiKwa

3 Likes

My current wallpaper.

The Best Iranian Aces all together in front of the Jet that gave them the capability to decimate Iraq’s Airforce.

2 Likes

VF-1 F-14A
F14A with irst under nose

1 Like

This is TCS camera not the IRST

1 Like

image
main issue is how would we differentiate this? a changeable option in the spawn/modifications menu like alternate cannons? or different aircraft in tree?

5 Likes

the one pictured is TCS yes but it could be swapped for an IR seeker

3 Likes

I know Jammers aren’t in the game but the f14s including the Iranian one had the AN/ALQ 100 deception jammer and track breaker antenna
It could interfere with the E,F,G, and H radar bands

1 Like

Not very useful.

1 Like

For Air to Air, sure. But it’s supposed to deal with SAM threats. Of which it handles 'Nam era Emplacements pretty well, and can cause early fusing of the warhead for many radar proximity / Command detonation fuses.

2 Likes

if things like s200 where added then it would be

It also has the ALQ-126 which to my knowledge in AtA jamming
TA61122m

3 Likes

yep that is for I and J band jamming the A didn’t have it though

2 Likes

They do but only for block 120 / 130 New build airframes, or those remanufactured into the block 135 configuration (rebuilt Block 60 & -65 airframes), to bring them into line with the F-14"A+" (F-14B) internal configuration. This would have occurred between '84-'87.

4 Likes


Gaijin please do the right thing.


Bring the wing vapors with it!!!

5 Likes

I have full understanding if there’s limited dev resources/time, and that adding this new AoA limiter feature to a bazillion planes might be too much for this update, but I agree with you.

It’s not OK to simply label “not a bug” in this case. That essentially amounts to throwing a genuine report in the paper bin.

IMO the correct response would be “Accepted, will be implemented at a later date”

2 Likes

I wouldn’t be mad if they hadn’t of said “No further bug reports will be accepted.”

As you said, it’s throwing a genuine report in the garbage.

3 Likes

Yeah, apparently the installation of AN/ALQ-126 started around 1984 with the F-14A BuNo.161168.

It can be seen in some F-14As taken around the same time.


VF-1 Wolfpack 1984


VF-1 Wolfpack 1986


VF-211 Checkmates 1987

However, not all Tomcats belonging to their particular Squadron underwent this modification, and we could see a mix of those modified or not Tomcats throughout the 80s-90s even on same squadron.

For their mechanics, it must have been horrible.

4 Likes

Thought I’d bump this topic since I’ve added more info to my bug report, and no longer need to go the long way around and provide a design lineage bridge to the TISEO to the TCS prove functionality.

[DEV]The F-14B should be impacted by this change to IRST/EOTS

And that the report is still awaiting acceptance after 9 Days for a Dev server issue, which regrettably likely also make it to live.

Now resolved, classed as “not a bug” due to not having it’s independent search and track functionality implemented in game. As the referenced changes only impact aircraft that do. So no dice there.


Also as there is an existing report on the issue, anything further would be marked as a duplicate report, so we’re in effectively stuck in a Catch 22 waiting for the Dev’s to implement an existing feature to an airframe that they have forgotten about.

6 Likes

No HPRF minimum range for F-14 radar
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Bigrv3MpYsuF

I finally found a footage showing that F-14A can detect and register signal returns from distances less than 5 km in TWS-Manual mode.

Image

F-14 2!15
F-14 2!20

10 Likes