except occasional schizo patch from Gaijin when they enable it just to disable it next patch.
I don’t know what they are saying.
MiG 25PD won’t have much chance in F-14 games…
In order to gain advantage in speed it has to be pretty high… on the deck is slower than a Phantom.
If it go pretty high , it’ll get pretty Fakoured , because with that maneuverabilty and in those speeds it won’t evade ever. Even with AIM-54s it won’t.
say whatever you like, player show different playstyle and you cannot say it has no change without being in the game.
What other playstyle is there for the MiG-25?? It’s quite literally designed to climb high and get fast. That’s it. If another plane does that better, it’s useless.
Gl going high with the spo-10 rwr and not be blasted outta the sky with any radar missile lol
we’ll see when it come out
the performance of the mig-25 is well known and if we get the Mig-25PD with the SPO-10 and no CMs then you wont even be able to survive a F-4 launching at you and even less a F-14
we dont know if it will face f14 yet, f4 dont take a lot effort to chaff it and turn and run
Mig-25 vs weakest mig-23m with r-23t telephone pole of doom
how will you chaff a missile without having any countermeasures?
no cms means very low br, and no one want a mig25 at 10.7 or 11.0
Yeahhhhh!!! finally.
Well, I wonder when it’ll be implemented.

When they’ll fix 54s…
Funny joke
Meanwhile NASA has a report about the missile. Yes they used 54C with modifications … but they give the performance data with the normal 54C for comparison. Just copy that damn thing…
The missiles mach number is over 3 mach for a good 120 seconds. In game barely touches 3 mach …
If statshark is accurate for the game… F90 behaves like what 54C should.
Grumman confirms the F-14D’s APG-71 radar has double the range of the AWG-9.
Just found this now.
That means the range is 2 x 370km, which is 740km of range. Wild.
With no parameters this statement is meaningless
