also heres my bug report: [DEV] F-102 Missile Armament Incorrect (missing AIM-4A/C/D) // Gaijin.net // Issues 
Nope, it won’t. It seems it got closed too. Utterly unfathomable.
@Smin1080p_WT, with all due respect, this really needs to be reevaluated. Considerable data, including not only real documents but also in-game experiments, have shown unequivocally that the early AIM-4 Falcons, with their shorter-burning but more powerful engines, can accelerate to much higher speeds at lower altitudes than the later Super Falcons, making them superior to the Super Falcons for the slower F-102, and for the typical War Thunder meta.
Further, it has been shown via documentation and by simply looking at the in-game model that the F-102 was physically incapable of equipping the Super Falcons, as they were too large to fit in the weapons bay (with the sole exception of the centerline bays, but only after the widening modification to fit the AIM-26B, which renders the side racks beside the modified bay unusable). Thus, the argument of “technical compatibility” falls flat, and the ahistorical Super Falcon loadouts should be removed.
Bug Report: https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/VdgPfytXaUgv
In the face of this evidence, the only way to make the F-102 historically accurate at all is to remove the Super Falcons and replace them with earlier Falcon missiles, mostly the AIM-4A and AIM-4D. Why, then, is seemingly nothing being done, and why is our evidence being disregarded by the developers with no chance of counterargument?
4 Likes
This is just depressing to read. I am speechless at this level of stupidity
the supers should removed due the fact they can’t fit alone just like how 9M was removed from the F-15 MRML this major but apparently they have different standards for the F-102 now
continuing here