Big bunch of them here
1 Like
F-102 is all we have left now in the way of supersonic falcon carriers
F4D Phantom II also exists
Thank you so much!!
I really don’t expect to get a phantom that only has 4Ds, they will be a lower tier mod on it IF its added so that doesn’t really count imo
It has been proven that it can use XAIM-4H as well, so that would be a kind of top-tier mods along with possible AIM-9J.
Day 2, more dev bug reports (will add more over time)
2 Likes
You could say the same about F-100D and F-105D
1 Like
the AIM-4H is still not on the level of the AIM-9 though is it, the range will be significantly less, especially at low altitudes
as far as i know they should be all aspect
so should the AIM-4D and AIM-4G, I still don’t think they’ll be as good as sidewinders, even the H, the range just isn’t as good, they cannot compete with the sidewinder, which is why I moreso count the F-101B, F-102A, and F-89H as “falcon carriers” as they don’t have the sidewinder
true. The AIM-4h has less range than the AIM-4D which is comparable to an AIM-9J
are we sure it’s comparable to a 9J? does the 4D/H not use the same motor as the G? is the AIM-4Hs range simply worse because of the slighty weight increase?
the D/H use the same motor as the AIM-4A, B and C not the one on the G and the AIM-4H weighs like 10 pounds more than the D since it has a larger warhead and a laser proximity fuse
alright, but is the standard falcon motor really enough to make the missile comparable in performance to a 9J? that just doesn’t sound right to me
somebody mapped the perfromace on stat shark
aim-4d compared to aim 26
aim-26 compared to AIM-9j
slightly less range
interesting, just breaks my heart even more that we still won’t be getting anything that carries early falcons for a long while most likely
the only thing that they will probably add that carries it will be the f-102
I do know 102 is most likely, and might not be too far off, but the wait feels so long already
