All sub-tree vehicles go to the nation the sub-tree is home in, those BMP-2s are coming to the UK whether you like it or not, after all, India was added for its Russian C&P. Even if a sub-tree has enough unique vehicles to be a new TT, there will be as many C&Ps are possable. India is no different.
So a split nation, guess what, those tanks will be premium and event then, not TT. At most your allowed one as researchable.
You know, people like US and German mains said the same about their Hornets, let’s see now the UK has them. As much as Gaijin doesn’t listen to the community, they also equaly as much listen to it. Guess why there are a lot of threads asking for that stuff to join the UK.
The additions of post-Cent MBTs are as likely as the UK getting F/A-18s from those nations. But they may not be tech-tree and equally as likely to be premium and event, even in the UK.
Because Gaijin isn’t fully consistent in line placement, there are always oddities; most lines have a general theme. The “IFV line” is the TD line in reality, so further additions to that line would be other missile carriers and howitzers.
The Kuwaiti Desert Warrior is in the tech tree because it is one of the more capable and significant variants of the Warrior, despite being from a nation that is not a full sub tree. There is zero reason the Jordanian Challengers couldn’t also be the same.
There was literally no reason to add Australian hornet to US as US already has the exact same planes in its tech tree. As i have said it multiple times that Australia and Canada should be a combined tree. Would it be copy paste? Yes it would be but does gaijin really care about uniqueness?. As long as Britian does not get Leo or Abram i am in support of combined TT of Australia and Canada. Might as well throw few more common wealth nation is this tree
The US mains wanted them to be SQV and premiums for them or not come at all. Heck, when the Canadian moment of volur added a Canadian skin to the F/A-18C (early), people thought that had stopped the CF-188 from coming period. It doesn’t matter whether or not they need it; they just need to spite the British and then blame them for claiming the world.
This I agree with (I really need to finish the ground side of the suggestion). Able to make a well-balanced tree
Well, Gaijin doesn’t care about uniqueness; it can easily be mostly unique or at least vehicles built by those nations, even if it’s just licensed-built stuff. With pure C&Ps being limited to non-existent, depending on the rank.
This is where I disagree, any short term addtions of them should be in the UK tree mostly do to the fact that both nations have everything else for them in the UK and would allow them to build a line-up.
MMEV after or foldered with the Chibi Adats? Since its another adats turret on a Canuck LAV chassis it would be pretty fun and the laser guided rockets as an option could be a unique addition to the brit TT.
Added a bunch more vehicles and reworked the base tree slightly more. Also reworked a few of the initial changes I made: Arjun Mk. 1A has been moved down in BR and rank, and the Al-Hussein Falcon has been moved up in both (and swapped places with the Al-Hussein Hybrid, going from premium to researchable)
I do like the Vickers Mk 7/2, but I don’t see why it would be 11.0. It basically just gets a reworked turret face, and even if it does provide minor armour increases, it won’t be enough to justify a BR increase. Theoretically I could just add it in the pre-existing 10.7 folder, but it feels slightly redundant…
Good idea!
I have thought about it — 8.7? Slightly better than the Ratel ZT3A2… Could be foldered with the Spartan then.
So let me ask, even though this suggestion is about domestic vehicles, why are there only 3 Indian vehicles provided?
Where are Abhay IFV, Kestrel, NAMICA, Trishul CV, QRSAM, Akash, DRDO 90 LT, DRDO 105 LT, CVRDE SPG, Karna?
If they add it with the Rh 120 and give it DM43 it would be better than L26 on it and it might have a better ready rack. Probably would be like 11.3 if all of it went through.
I want to add more Indian vehicles (and will do), but I also want to be careful not to just add Soviet or Soviet-inspired vehicles, like other Bhishma variants.
