I don’t doubt that lol
It is 1.5 in the game isn’t it? I was only lookin at it the other day. I could be wrong but
Yeah IRL it was something like 70 rounds a minute with a .6 second burst option
::EDIT::
“The maximum rate of fire was 2 rounds a second, however the FCS and stabilization was not able to keep up with this and so operationally the rate of fire was set to 1 round a second”
It would be extremely un-fun.
Some weapons / missiles are extremely overpowered / overkill in real life.
They don’t make things fair irl, and things have to be fair in a video game.
1 Like
Wait, you think the Bradly is under tiered? In what way is it undertiered compared to its rivals?
Edit: I just looked it up and thought it was 10.3-10.7, seems it’s 10.0 still and that feels completely correct. Not under tiered at all.
I meant it was lacking in a 12.0 game for anti heli duty. Sorry for the lack of clarity
Ahh, yeah of course, so over tiered you mean, sorta. With regards to 12.0 anyways. The rest I agree with though. I’ll take pantsir vs f16 over su34 with adats.
1 Like
Yes, topic about ammunition turns into CAS and AA argument…
On to the topic, it’s simple, they got “similiar” performing round , not by production date.
And anyway, top tier NATO rounds eats any T series tank like knife trough butter, unlike svinets round against top leo/strvs .
And on that offtopic, NATO still has best CAS , now svinets are just a bit closer to it. su34 is flying bus, but not so good as f15e, f16c, gripen…
because the russian one performs worse than the ones that are 4 generations older like the m829a1, btw there is no difference in penetration between the dm63 and dm 53, in fact the dm53 pens more and there which also the dm 73 pens barely more aswell as it keeps using the same round but with a higher muzzle velocity
That’s not entirely true. Even DM53 still has to aim for weakspots on BVM/90M, just like 3BM60 has to aim for weakspots on 2A7/122.
Su-34 w/ x6 KH38’s is legitimately incomparable to anything anyone else gets. It’s in a league of it’s own, whilst operating in a firendly, Pantsir enforced no fly zone for the other side.
you mean , that you just aim towards that T series, what is complete weakspot on that round, exluding time to time trollish bounce compared to actually having to aim against a7, or strv.
Well nope, If you just look plain missiles on paper yes, but after joining on nato side on F16C CAS playing has never been so easy, and still take a proper topic to continue debating about ussr vs nato CAS
1 Like
DM53 still has to aim for LFP, Drivers port or breach on BVM/90M. The areas with relikt coverage (Majority of the frontal surface area) are impenetrable.
smartest german main post
You kidding me bro?? lol check his stat
https://thunderskill.com/en/stat/ileaveuptiers/vehicles/r#type=army&role=all&country=all
USSR mains and Germany mains happens to be the quietest bunch, it is USA mains who complained nonstop, they also created the stereotype of Russian bias and Germany suffer and pass it off like everyone else sucks and what ironic is they who are the ones that living up the stereotype.
3 Likes
you are trash at the game, only thing underperforming is yourself
1 Like
Name any aspect of a tank and it’s probably incorrect or artificially nerfed on a NATO tank in game.
You realize that there is a whole other forum dedicated to Russia right?
IIRC the DM 63 has a longer rod and better propellant
It doesnt, it has the exact same round, the dm73 also shares the same round, just with a new propellant, most dm 53 were kept in service by just upgrading the propellant, as the dm 53a1
1 Like