Everything wrong with the Mirage IIIS

Dev Server "Leviathans" General Discussion - Dev Server
1

Wrong radar

One of the main differences between the IIIE and the IIIS is the radar.
Right now it is labeled as and works like the Cyrano Ibis, but is correctly modeled after the Hughes TARAN radar it had.

Spoiler

shot 2025.05.31 00.16.59

1000002896
10000028962560×3413 498 KB

Reports

[DEV] Mirage IIIS C.70 incorrect radar - accepted
[DEV] Swiss Mirage IIIS C70 wrong radar - duplicate

Missing and wrong droptanks under fuselage and wings

It currently has 2 1700l droptanks under the wings. Those are the same as the Mirage IIIE has. Switzerland used smaller underwing droptanks and also a central droptank under the fuselage.

Fuel Tanks

0479518-3304586776
0479518-33045867761450×993 757 KB

MG_Mirage III S_Swiss Air Force_J-2313_03.05.21_LSZC_6325
MG_Mirage III S_Swiss Air Force_J-2313_03.05.21_LSZC_63251200×800 702 KB

Report

[DEV] Mirage IIIS C.70 missing (and inaccurate) droptanks - accepted

Missing Aim-9P (P-3, P-4, P-5)

Currently it can only equip the Flz Lwf LL 63/75, which is the AIM-9E.

It is missing the AIM-9P variants it could carry:
Flz Lwf LL 63/91 (AIM-9P-5) (IRCCM)
Flz Lwf LL 63/90 (AIM-9P-4) (All-aspect)
Flz Lwf LL 63/80 (AIM-9P-3)

For balance it would make sense that it wouldn’t recieve the P-5, as it is IRCCM. But the very least at the current BR of 10.3 would be the Flz Lwf LL 63/80, the same missile the Squadron Hunter F.58 already has.
The P-4 could be added, but then with an increase in BR (to 10.7/11.0) of course.

Reports

[DEV] Mirage IIIS missing the Flz Lwf 63/80 - accepted
[DEV] Mirage IIIS C.70 incorrect AIM-9 model - accepted
[Dev] Mirage IIIS wrong radar, RWR and armament - not enough info

Missing JATO capabilities

It had the possibility to attach up to 8 solid rocket fuel boosters under the fuselage, reducing take off distance to under 300 meters.

Report

[DEV] Mirage IIIS C.70 missing JATO capabilities / boosters - accepted

Wrong RWR

It currently has the Mirage Detecteur RWR on the Dev-Server.

I should have the AN/ALR-87 RWR with an IP-1310/ALR RWR-display.

Report

[Dev] Mirage IIIS wrong RWR, should have AN/ALR-87 - accepted
[DEV] Mirage IIIS C.70 incorrect RWR - not a bug

Implemented dev 2.46.0.25

Edit:

All relevant reports have been accepted. Yippie!!!

Update: New issue found

Nosewheel extension in wrong position

Report

[Dev] Mirage IIIS wrong nosewheel extension (“Surgonflage”) - no label

Incorrect Elevon movement

Applying to all Mirage III airframes

Report

Mirage III Incorrect Elevon movement - no label

If you know something else wrong with the Mirage IIIS, feel free to comment down below.

19 Likes
2

I see the report on the SIWA’s was accepted, and while that apparentl y happened, I’ve writen a quite elaborate further explanation on Mirage SIWA combos in your report: Community Bug Reporting System

2 Likes
3

Note that the use of JATO rockets was only possible without weapons and minimal internal fuel.

The ide never was to operate from short (or damaged) runways, but simply to relocate aircraft that were marooned aircraft on bombed airfields, with just enough fuel to get to another, still undamaged airfield.

I’ve whitnessed several Mirage III JATO takeoff’s myself. Very impressive and loud!!!

2 Likes
4

The Swiss Mirages used 500 Liter FLUNT (FLügel-UNter-Tank, “underwing tank”) and 730 Liter or 1100 Liter RUNT (RUmpf-UN-ter-Tank, "under fuselage tank).

  • The FLUNT were either mounted fix (AMD FLUNT) or droppable (IMI FLUNT), and suited for supersonic flight.
  • The 730 Liter tank (IMI RUNT) was droppable and suited for supersonic flight.
  • The 1100 Liter Tank (AMD RUNT) was droppable, but only cleared for up to max. Mach 1.2

While usually the Mirage IIIS was equipped with the fixed AMD FLUNT earlier, in the latest phase of their service, the FLUNTS were often omitted and only the 730 Liter RUNT carried, to increase the Mirage’s performance and improve their change in dogfights agains more modern aircraft, mot commonly the F/A-18 Hornets, against which they sparred often (and were not easy prey!). The large 1100 Liter runts were mostly used for ferry flights over longer distances.

Little anectode: In the Swiss AF there was the Mach 2 club, and a proud member only became who ever flew the Mirage over Mach 2. According to a personal friend and ex Mirage test pilot, there were two ways to get the Mirage IIIS to the required altitude and speed: Either you flew it completely clean, or with two FLUNT. Funnily enough, when returning, both aircaft with and without FLUNT had about the same amount of fuel remaining after those very short sorties: The ones with FLUNT had more fuel, but the increased drag of the FLUNT practically ate up the whole amount they had in excess over the clean aircraft!

Spoiler

grafik

4 Likes
5

@Schindibee do you happen to know or have some way of finding out what RWR was included in the C.70 upgrade?

This this report: Community Bug Reporting System the mod is correct in that the IP-1310/ALR was just the azimuth display. But that still leaves the question as to what RWR was actually installed and I have not been able to find anything on the matter.

6

We got some feedback to the drop tank report, saying some more info on the tank themselves would be welcome.
So we probably need something more ‘official’.

Also where is the picture from?

7

@DiamondCraftLP @Schindibee

So, I believe that everything has reported and accepted for the Mirage IIIS C.70

[DEV] Mirage IIIS C.70 missing (and inaccurate) droptanks
[DEV] Mirage IIIS C.70 inaccurate camouflage
[DEV] Mirage IIIS C.70 missing JATO capabilities / boosters
[DEV] Mirage IIIS C.70 incorrect AIM-9 model
[DEV] Mirage IIIS missing the Flz Lwf 63/80
[DEV] Mirage IIIS C.70 incorrect radar

…Except for the RWR, which I still haven’t been able to find any information on.

8

Could possibly be the AN/APR-39 as it has been installed on a Mirage III:

image
image1463×974 134 KB

But in any case, I’m pretty sure it will be an American system.

9

I couldn’t find anything more either. The sources (mostly 3rd party websites) all mentioned the IP-1310/ALR, but since thats the display idk…

I remember reading in a comment somewhere that it should be the same RWR as the Swiss F-5 has? So the AN/ALR-46… But idk about the valitidy of that claim.

Have you gotten any info about the RWR from the manual @Schindibee?

Edit: Going off the naming of the RWR display in the shown system, the RWR must be an ALR RWR.

IP 1150/APR-39 → AN/APR-39

IP-1310/ALR → AN/ALR-??

example: the F-16 also uses the IP-1310/ALR display and uses an ALR RWR

10

On it, got the original pilots manual which contains detailed info on the RWR.

Quite a few things have now been accepted, the manual I sent them via tech mods probably goes a long way to confirm the issues, so atm. I’m pretty hopeful we’ll see at least some improvements…

Anyone reported already the inoperability of the FALCO’s?

1 Like
11

they are not ready yet

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Ka0YMzZq2wIm

12

Ok, collected the info on the AN/ALR-87 now from the MIRO’s pilot manual, report here, please support: [Dev] Mirage IIIS wrong RWR, should have AN/ALR-87 // Gaijin.net // Issues

3 Likes
13

very nice!

14

Forwarded.

4 Likes
15

Splendid! Much appreciated!

Now on to the TARAN radar and navigation system. Sadly this is only covered in the second volumen of the MIRO’s pilot manual, and I only got volume 1 (but which mentions the TARAn in the index as well as the aircraft general description)…

16

Hi, for the non-droppable 500L tank, do you know if it’s the same as on the French Mirage III? Because if it is, I have a source showing the installation of a non-droppable 500L on a 3E

17

Excellent work on the RWR.

As for TARAN, there is a document here which explains some of these uses and specifications of the radar, I included it in my original report:

I think it better to wait until it’s actually implemented before making any further reports about it.

One thing I couldn’t determine however is if it had the ability to provide a gun lead on air targets. I believe it can do that for ground targets, but not sure for air.

2 Likes
18

Well, the whole TARAN integration was largely responsible for the whole scandal that was called the “Mirage Affäre” which led to quite a few “rolling heads”, including then Federal Council Chaudet, and was a major cornerstone in the history of the Swiss Army.

The TARAN was specifically designed for the Swiss Mirage IIIS, based on the radar systems employed int he F-102 and F-106, which also used it specifically for the use in connection with the HM-55/AIM-26 Falcon missiles. The TARAN testing and integration was the reason why Swiss Mirages went to Holloman in the USA for a while, even.

IIRC the main difference to the preceding US system was the improved possibility to use the system for navigation (including a basic ground mapping or at least referencing method), ground attack capability and a by then ultra modern moving map display (I very much hope they somehow find a way to implement this as well, maybe as minimap MFD).

One can truly not mention TARAN without mentioning the Mirage IIIS as well, and vice versa!

image
image2560×3269 1.12 MB

(Note: image found on official archive page of the Swiss Governement…)

So far I found little technical info, but a whole collection of Government Documents in the archives that cover the Mirage IIIS/TARAN/HM-55 purchase and the accompanying political fallout.

Can’t get much more official that official government coverage, eh? = )

2 Likes
19

The reports here, and the drop-tanks, are just for the Swiss Mirage IIIS. I am not familiar with the IIIE, but I don’t think France used these tanks on their Mirage IIIEs.

If the IIIE could also carry other tanks than the ones in game already, and you got a good source proving that, I would suggest making a seperate report about that.

20

If you search for images of the IIIE, you will find a lot of images of underwing tanks that at the very least look very similar to the 500 liter tanks we used, like this one here:

image
image1024×675 139 KB