As Devil said i won’t share it without approval
i understand that but it is underperforming by a lot for the BR that it is in
the FGR 2 has a better radar for what it does than the Captor M at the moment and that thing is in 12.0
1 Like
eh you’re both kinda somewhat right
Captor M was build based on experience with Blue Vixen
Blue Vixen was build based on APG-65
it’s related just as much as the G3 and STG44 or you and your ancestors from the middle ages
Flame? With the refresh of 8sec and then 2 sec in priority track?
I personally am foolish enough to believe that it’s just not finished yet
the APG-65 too was Horrible for a few months after F4F-ICE was released and by now it’s pretty fine actually
*insert the Jesse Pinkman’s " He can’t keep getting away with it" meme
This is probably the first aircraft i’ve had a serious interest in getting right (mainly because I’m a tech on them IRL - no I wont be leaking anything before anyone asks) - but seeing how difficult it is to make a change has been… eye opening…
1 Like
No it very much was not
Like very not like completely different
The Tornado textures seem to be distributed in 4k even if you don’t have the high res texture pack installed. Typhoons normal textures are 2k, which is standard for the majority of game assets if you don’t have the high res pack - so they will look 1/2 resolution compared to the Tornado. With the texture pack Typhoon is also 4k
The unlockable/GE textures are probably also 4k as they’re downloaded from Gaijin’s servers rather than distributed with the game files
It takes ~8 second in total to preform 4 bar 140 wide scan. Radar will quickly jump to the target every bar to update it. So yea, update every ~2s.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Is it still possible for Gaijin to fix the Catcher M, the Catcher M is now worse than any radar above 13.0 (except for N001
you are correct the Vixen was just comparable with the AN/APG 65 but the Vixen radar and the captor M have a lot of years of difference
nop i have funny news the 12.0 FGR2 radar is better at locking and tracking XDDD
2 Likes
And guess what… It takes 8sec to do current 4bar ±60(first refresh of first bar). With that bug fixed, it would be sub 4 seconds to refresh first bar. 140*4 would be around 8 seconds.
The radar is ok… BUG IS KILLING IT
Fixing that bug will literally MORE THAN DOUBLE refresh rate of captor.
1 Like
i really hope all of this complaining is heired … right FBI snail agent ?
The AN/APG-65 was the predecessor to the MSD2000, not the CAPTOR-M. CAPTOR-M was previously known as ECR-90, which was developed from Blue Vixen.
There was a competition to decide which radar would be used and every nation apart from Germany wanted the ECR-90, on account of MSD2000 not meeting many of the requirements. However Germany refused to accept the ECR-90 (on somewhat spurious grounds), and ended up delaying the selection of the radar for two years before finally giving in and letting ECR-90 be selected.
So if anything that means CAPTOR-M was even more of an improvement over APG-65 that it otherwise would have been.
4 Likes
Has that been bug reported then?
I don’t think so. Owner should do it when he gets everything he needs. Also Bug report site is dead.
Not a surprise, they are still working on almost everything this rushed patch has thrown out
1 Like