Idk remember as stated by Smins own words subsequent differences so one missiles is good enough. Maybe a EFT with only ASRAAM and then maybe with only fox 3 who knows the possibilities are endless /s
ASRAAM like MICA IR are a balance nightmare
IRIS-T and 9X are shorter range and easier to balance
I see 9X, IRIS-T and R-74 being added
I also see ASRAAM and MICA IR being somewhat negated by MAWS systems. Added too late to be useable
Would be interesting to see gaijin take a break from true top tier and start adding prototype missiles stuff like RB 72 (which wouldve been the oldest IRCCM missile had it entered production and not had the US intervene and push for restrictions.) Or we could see gaijin go the Su-25BM route and see 9X and such on small trainer esq aircraft to see how they perform before deciding or potentially try an event? April is just around the corner so i mean it wouldn’t suprise me if they tried another Warthunder 2077 approach with Ace combat esq aircraft.
ahaha, nah I’m kidding, that’s pretty bad. I’ve raised a report internally.
…
11 Likes
Hey @Gunjob sorry for the ping, since the Su-30 and, I think, the J11B got their Hud tints modelled correctly, is there any chance we can expect the same for the Eurofighters?
3 Likes
I’ll ask.
6 Likes
:)
Zusammenfassung
Can I get the Dublicate Label?
(Referring to Internal Report :) )
Community Bug Reporting System
120A and 9M vs 120C-5 and 9M is pretty balanced to me
I doubt it to be honest. We are full send to Gen 5.
I see Gen 5 before IIR added to game or larger maps
How good is an F-22s RAM at fooling arhm seekers
Top tier earns them money and gaijin is gonna try to get late model.hornets as premiums lets be real cause we know they are gonna sell.
Speaking of HUD tints, I’d assume the HMD’s (on most/all aircrafts) would have a sun visor and would likely also be polarized, neither of which seems to be implemented in-game.
You mean 6? Cause iirc it can carry 6 Aim-120+ 2 Aim-9.
The control surfaces on the a are too big to allow it to carry any more than 4.
1 Like
Well, yes, but all these stated values are LESS than the real ones. This is stated directly in these statements. I would expect a range similar to the Derby. Because Python 4 should be close in engine power to ASRAAM, and Derby is a development based on Python 4.
MICA NG?
Well, I was wrong. It doesn’t look like a buff at all. They added resistance, took away almost half a ton of thrust at base speeds, but gave half a ton of thrust at speeds that are almost impossible to reach…
P.S. To hell with it. Now I’m completely confused by this data.
2 Likes
From Datamine;
- Eurofighter [DEU], F-2000A, Typhoon F.G.R. Mk. 4:
- horizontal stabilizer zero-lift drag coefficient Mach curve linear coefficient changed from -0.5 to -0.1, curve will now decline much less past M0.97, leading to increased parasitic drag from the canard after that speed (comparison)
- vertical stabilizer zero-lift drag coefficient Mach curve linear coefficient changed from -0.4 to -0.1, curve will now decline much less past M1.2, leading to increased parasitic drag from the vertical stabilizer after that speed (comparison)
- engine thrust adjustment at ~11000 m (comparison):
- changed altitude point to be interpolated at 11000 m instead of 12000 m
- decreased thrust by ~400 kgf from 1000 km/h to 1920 km/h
- increased thrust by >500 kgf past 1920 km/h
There is MICA NG EM which could be added along with F.4. Even if not, giving the MICA its historical range performance would already be a big leap in theory and possibly sufficient for the time being.
Probably solid. But there is still mid-course guidance/datalink that makes it less of an issue
According to this site and other ones F-22 can carry 6 Amraam+ 2 Aim-9.
So Yeah, it can carry 6 Aim-120 without any issue.
Those are AIM-120C, clipped wings
2 Likes
Do we know what sources they used to reduce Thrust at slower speeds?
Everyone even Raptor guys who have flown the Typhoon have said the climb rate and acceleration are incredible.
4 Likes