The AIM-174 that only exists on one of if not the slowest aircraft at its BR?
That’s very different from the missile going 100km in 90 seconds
confused aim424 with aim174 locked in
traveling 100km in 90 seconds is the source
AIM-174 range may not be too far off. It’s close to a full meter longer
Usually unless specified otherwise the “this aam can go this far” part is against an actual target, not just how far the missile itself goes
hmmm, bvr missile.

There’s a your mom joke going if anyone wants to take it
I’m expecting meteor to be like a kh-31pd that can actually maneuver, will be by far best best missile in the game if it just sustians mach 4 for over 100 seconds like kh31
Yeah, we can hope that is what it will be, and thus bridge the gap with having a lower missile count to the F-15EX and Su-30SM2
But this all started with me making a joke about what Gaijin will consider a Marketing lie, sounds like the US mains are also calling primary sources marketing lies too. They really dont like anyone else having anything on par or better
hopefully they will actualy fix their code for ramjets by then
so it doesnt horribly over preform like that is
or be nerfed just like the seeker for kh31
![]()
Wait until they find out that the F35s don’t carry chaff…
Should be a C&P of the MICA seeker, but knowing Gaijin, it will probably be a Aim-54 seeker or something
That is gunna be funny.
Still doesn’t specify completely. Like I said range figures tend to be for head on targets.
Then you have to account for launch conditions.
Meteor will probably end up being better than 120D kinematically anyways
hope they fix the seeker for high speed missile. as for now, some of the long and dual pulse radar missile ( not fox 3 ) lose lock and IOG far more easily than it should.
why would they make a missile that costs orders of magnitudes more just to be worse than their competitor
because they’d never adopt anything they can’t produce domestically lmao
It’s like $1.5 million vs $3 million or something like that, hardly orders of magnitude more expensive
Also all of these US examples still can’t address why the Chinese decided against it
