MBDA is claiming a 2xASRAAM 4xMeteor fit as well;
This is for the F-35A for Italian Meteor integration.
Oh and to add to that, that’s an A i believe.
Yeah there we go, A has a longer bay that’s also larger.
1 Like
Yep in game it will fly like a rocket unable to turn…because how could something with no large fins like Superior R-27 even hope to pull more than 15G
Well Gaijin can always give us the Aus F-35A if the RAF don’t buy them
The other missile is an AMRAAM, that was my point. You may get 2+2 but not so sure about all 4 being Meteor.
Look at that cable management
1 Like
Let me guess how it will be implemented. (Not clipped wing). 20-30g turn rate. No throttable ramjet mode, just a super long motor burn. Same seeker as aim120b. Call it a day.
5 Likes
Indeed, and that render is of a B, but we will see when it shows up that way, as I mentioned further up. We are yet to see a flight test of 4 Meteor.
We have only ever seen mockups and renders of that configuration, and flight tests of 2Meteor+2AMRAAM.
They’d do better to copy the MICA seeker, Meteor uses a MICA seeker derivative.
1 Like
See now this I could work with but that this point we aint stealth anymore and it still doesn’t have a radar like ECRS.
2 Likes
Gaijin: “please provide 10 OEM manuals proving that meteor uses the same seeker as mica.”
1 Like
We do actually have quite a lot of sourcing for this.
It’s also why I personally believe that France Veto’d JNAAM.
Might as well stick to EFT on that point. Ignoring all the sensors comparisons.
F-35 is nowhere near the Kinematic performance of Eurofighter, IRL and in-game. You just wouldn’t choose to sacrifice that.
how does LOAL work without datalink ? is like like firing fox3s and waiting for its own seeker head to pick up the target ? but with IIR ?
Yes, the HMD/Radar/IRST provide target data to the missile which is loaded prelaunch. The missile then goes on a pre-planned course based on that target data and searches the expected area with its seeker.