The 25km is the best we have, tho it is either incorrect or correct in a very specific scenario, so specific, that they were not afraid to give it to the public.
Or it’s just BFBS saying stuff without consulting the MoD.
It is what is it, a simple claim by the BFBS News, how much weight you want to give it is up to you. But as you say as it currently stands that’s the only “tracking” figure I’m aware of.
1 Like
Given the context, wouldnt it be some reasonable to assume the target was probably relatively cold targets like drones or cruise missiles?
(just caught up with the discussion, never mind)
I assumed the data was from Ukraine from actual deployment I had not seen the article.
It’s all cleared up now
No, there is no reasonable assumption we have no data points to go off. The context of the segment was of the ASRAAM missile, not its employment in any given situation and is independent of discussion of Raven in Ukraine during the rest of the video.
Media literacy is dying haha.
2 Likes
I’ve always assumed it was effective range, rather than absolute max range. But Gaijin being Gaijin. They’ll probably self-destruct after 25km
Initially slower, but for the regime it’s slower you can probably abuse ASRAAM or take AMRAAM.
1 Like
I still do not understand the decision to procure A’s when the production lot will only be finished 2 years before Tempest IOC, on a plane which by that point will still only just be acquiring a basic UK weapons fit likely to also be included on Tempest, additionally we will have no sovereign control over them.
(Admittedly the A’s will probably be the earliest deliveries).
But to address the overarching point, yes we had better hope for A’s from Australia as the B will be the worst G-rating, with the fewest missiles and the worst T/W. And although our advantage will be the long range IR ASRAAM depending on how they implement stealth that might be a huge win, you still will only have 2 of them.
F-35 has a few issues that will likely result in a bit of a mid addition when it finally turns up.
Low countermeasure count;
BAE Systems presentation has 48 for the two bins;
Corrospondes to the two bin mounts seen here;
The only aspect of the F-35 im even remotely interested in is how they modeled the cockpit, especially the HMD and look-through-cockpit thing. If they model it at all.
They can’t even model HMD thermal vision.
1 Like
Yup, exactly :D
Big stretched blob
They can’t even model unstretched HUD, or a UV tint. It’s too hard
2 Likes
You can see through the cockpit but vehicles dont appear for some reason :D
Radar while a fast scanning AESA, is a fixed plate system, which feels pretty antiquated by systems like ECRS will also be a bit of a let down.
Missile fit is a firm 6 missiles right now. 2x ASRAAM and 4x Meteor, I’m not sure how well that will do with the WT meta where spam has a quality of its own.
Its just gunna be our top tier CAS aircraft I think. All i plan to use it for
I mean they seem to be able to do it for pretty much everything else other than the Typhoons.
I’m just wondering if they will be able to make the gunsight work with those aircraft. (Again unlike the Typhoon.)
2 Likes
Makes no sense. For example, rafale, SU30, J10C got their UV tint on Day 1. Eurofighter bug report still standing for over a year now.
3 Likes
Even in CAS compared to a 4.5 Generation aircraft its a meagre load. 8x SPEAR while stealth, if you give up your only advantage which is RCS you can add 4xPW4 to that. Typhoon blows it out of the water for A2G capabilities.
1 Like