Possible lol
I think I have been given incorrect information from the DCS forum! So inverse pulse is more accurate
At determining ground clutter?
Should the R-27 seeker be far more resistant to Chaff or Notching than the 7M?
Inverse monopulse seekers are much more reliable against low flying targets, but that doesn’t mean it is impossible for con-scan seekers to hit such targets, they are just not as good at it. One of the main improvement offered by inverse monopulse seekers is the elimination of glint (a phenomenon causing con-scan seekers to become confused when they get close to the target and miss).
1 Like
so the aesaphoon grind is going great
11 Likes
That is sad, hell my F-5AG gets 30k RP with less effort hvad helvede are those rewards
These RP boosters are a scam
i mean it adds up to a multi game 150% rp booster
So are we gonna get a decent radar model like all (yes, all) the other new jets did?
Spoiler
every single other new toptier airframe this update for scale
It’s not like we don’t know what ECRS Mk.2 looks like.
so whats your source for it not being a monopulse seeker?
tbf the gripen radar also looks kinda sad compared to the others, especially the super hornet
True but at least they made it vaguely the correct shape lol
Stepanovich once posted about R-27R’s test results against low flying aircraft.
Which aren’t real, lol
explain this
Drunk GBU
But that’s a spice…
1 Like
I think it went for a barrel? lol
I mean, we know gaijin right? And we remember how they “reworked” guided munition right?
My guess is that instead of center mass of your tank it now aims for the center mass of a random module’s hitbox.
Eh close enough, i haven’t played with spice yet, just been using Penguino’s
2.53.0.17 → 2.53.0.18
CAPTOR-E ECRS Mk1 (Eurofighter (P4E) [DEU]), CAPTOR-E ECRS Mk2 (F-2000A (P4E), Typhoon F.G.R. Mk. 4 (P4E)), ES-05 (JAS 39E): no longer fast TWS (?)
I’ll look forward to it a little.
2 Likes